CENTRAL BANK POLICIES AND INCOME AND WEALTH INEQUALITY: A SURVEY
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews recent research on the relationship between central bank policies and inequality. A new paradigm which integrates sticky‐prices, incomplete markets, and heterogeneity among households is emerging, which allows for the joint study of how inequality shapes macroeconomic aggregates and how macroeconomic shocks and policies affect inequality. The new paradigm features multiple distributional channels of monetary policy. Most empirical studies, however, analyze each potential channel of redistribution in isolation. Our review suggests that empirical research on the effects of conventional monetary policy on income and wealth inequality yields mixed findings, although there seems to be a consensus that higher inflation, at least above some threshold, increases inequality. In contrast to common wisdom, conclusions concerning the impact of unconventional monetary policies on inequality are also not clear cut. To better understand policy effects on inequality, future research should focus on the estimation of General Equilibrium models with heterogeneous agents.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature identifies up to six channels of redistribution of monetary policy.
“Although the literature identifies up to six such channels (e.g., Colciago, Samarina, and de Haan 2019, 5;Coibion et al., 2017, 81-5), what matters for our purposes is the distinction between two kinds of effects monetary policy has on distribution.”
From Independent Agencies, Distribution, and Legitimacy: The Case of Central Banks (2020) · cites this paper as Colciago, Samarina, and de Haan 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 74
- Adam, K. and Tzamourani, P. (2016) Distributional consequences of asset price inflation in the Euro area. European Economic Review 89: 172-192.
- Adam, K. and Zhu, J. (2016) Price-level changes and the redistribution of nominal wealth across the Euro area. Journal of European Economic Association 14(4): 871-906.
- Agénor, P.-R. (2004) Macroeconomic adjustment and the poor: analytical issues and cross-country evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys 18(3): 351-408.
- Aiyagari, S.R. (1994) Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 659-684.
- Albanesi, S. (2007) Inflation and inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics 54(4): 1088-1114.
- Areosa, W.D. and Areosa, M.B.M. (2016) The inequality channel of monetary transmission. Journal of Macroeconomics, 48: 214-230.
- Atkinson, A.B. (2015) Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Atkinson, A.B., Piketty, T. and Saez, E. (2011) Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature 49(1): 3-71.
- Aye, G.C., Clance, M.W. and Gupta, R. (2019) The effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policy shocks on U.S. inequality: the role of uncertainty. Quality and Quantity 53(1): 283-295. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0752-3. · DOI
- Bank of England. (2012) The distributional effects of asset purchases. Quarterly Bulletin Q3: 254-266, Bank of England, London.
- Bayer, C., Luetticke, R Pham-Dao, L. and Tjaden, V. (2019) Precautionary savings, illiquid assets, and the aggregate consequences of shocks to household income risk. Econometrica 87(1): 255-290.
- Bazillier, R. and Hericourt, J. (2017) The circular relationship between inequality, leverage, and financial crises. Journal of Economic Surveys 31(2): 463-496.
- Bewley, T. (1977) The permanent income hypothesis: a theoretical formulation. Journal of Economic Theory 16(2): 252-292.
- Bilbiie, F. (2008) Limited asset market participation, monetary policy, and (inverted) aggregate demand logic. Journal of Economic Theory 140: 162-196.
- Blinder, A., Ehrmann, M., de Haan, J. and Jansen, D. (2017) Necessity as the mother of invention: monetary policy after the crisis. Economic Policy 32(92): 707-755.
- Bonhomme, S. and Hospido, L. (2017) The cycle of earnings inequality: evidence from Spanish social security data. Economic Journal 127: 1244-1278.
- Brewer, M. and Wren-Lewis, L. (2016) Accounting for changes in income inequality: decomposition analyses for the UK, 1978-2008. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78: 289-322.
- Brzoza-Brzezina, M., Kolasa, M., Koloch, G., Makarski, K. and Rubaszek, M. (2013) Monetary policy in a non-representative agent economy: a survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 27(4): 641-669.
- Bulíř, A. (2001) Income inequality: does inflation matter? IMF Staff Papers, 48(1): 139-159.
- Campbell, J.Y. and Mankiw, N.G. (1989) Consumption, income, and interest rates: reinterpreting the time series evidence. In O. Blanchard and S. Fisher (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual (pp. 185-216). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Canzoneri M.B., Cumby, R.E. and Diba, B.T. (2007) Euler equations and money market interest rates: a challenge for monetary policy models. Journal of Monetary Economics 54: 1863-1881.
- Carpantier, J.-F., Olivera, J. and van Kerm, P. (2017) Macroprudential policy and household wealth inequality. Journal of International Money and Finance 85: 262-277.
- Casiraghi, M., Gaiotti, E. Rodano,L. and Secchi, A. (2018) A "reverse Robin Hood"? The distributional implications of non-standard monetary policy for Italian households. Journal of International Money and Finance 85: 215-235.
- Clerc, L., Derviz, A., Mendicino, C., Moyen, S., Nikolov, K., Stracca, L., Suarez, J. and Vardoulakis, A. (2015) Capital regulation in a macroeconomic model with three layers of default. International Journal of Central Banking 11: 9-63.
- Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Kudlyak, M. and Mondragon, J. (2014) Does greater inequality lead to more household borrowing? New evidence from household data. NBER Working Paper 19850, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
- Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Kueng, L. and Silvia, J. (2017) Innocent bystanders? Monetary policy and inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics 88: 70-88.
- Colciago, A. (2011). Rule-of-thumb consumers meet sticky wages. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43(2): 325-353.
- de Haan, J. and Sturm, J-E. (2017) Finance and income inequality: a review and new evidence. European Journal of Political Economy 50: 171-195.
- De Mendonc ¸a, H.F. and Esteves, D.M. (2018) Monetary authority's transparency and income inequality. Review of Development Economics 2018: 1-26.
- De Nardi, M. and Fella, G. (2017) Saving and wealth inequality. Review of Economic Dynamics 26: 280-300.
- Doepke, M. and Schneider, M. (2006) Inflation and the redistribution of nominal wealth. Journal of Political Economy 114(6): 1069-1097.
- Domanski, D., Scatigna, M. and Zabai, A. (2016) Wealth inequality and monetary policy. BIS Quarterly Review, March 2016, Bank for International Settlements, Basel.
- Erosa, A. and Ventura, G. (2002) On inflation as a regressive consumption tax. Journal of Monetary Economics 49(4): 761-795.
- Easterly, W. and Fischer, S. (2001) Inflation and the poor. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 33(2): 160-178.
- Frost, J. and van Stralen, R. (2017) Macroprudential policy and income inequality. Journal of International Money and Finance 85: 278-290.
- Furceri, D. and Loungani, P. (2017) The distributional effects of capital account liberalization. Journal of Development Economics 130: 127-144.
- Furceri, D., Loungani, P. and Zdzienicka, A. (2018) The effects of monetary policy shocks on inequality. Journal of International Money and Finance 85: 168-186.
- Galì, J., Lopez-Salido D. and Valles, J. (2007) Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. Journal of the European Economic Association 5(1): 227-270.
- Guerello, C. (2018) Conventional and unconventional monetary policy vs. households income distribution: an empirical analysis for the Euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance 85: 187-214.
- Heathcote, J., Perri F. and Violante G. (2010) Unequal we stand: an empirical analysis of economic inequality in the United States, 1967-2006. Review of Economic Dynamics 13(1): 15-51.
- Hohberger, S., Priftis, R. and Vogel, L. (2019) The distributional effects of conventional monetary policy and Quantitative Easing: evidence from an estimated DSGE model. Journal of Banking and Finance, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.01.002. · DOI
- Huang, H.-C., Lin, S.-C., Suen, Y.-B., and Yeh, C.-C. (2007) A quantile inference of the Kuznets hypothesis. Economic Modelling 24(4): 559-570.
- Huggett, M. (1993) The risk-free rate in heterogeneous-agent incomplete-insurance economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17: 953-969.
- Imrohoroglu, A. (1989) Cost of business cycles with indivisibilities and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1364-1383.
- Jaumotte, F., Lall, S. and Papageorgiou, C. (2013) Rising income inequality: technology, or trade and financial globalization? IMF Economic Review 61(2): 271-309.
- Juan-Francisco, A.M., Gómez-Fernández, N.M. and Ochando Claramunt, C. (2018) Effects of unconventional monetary policy on income and wealth distribution: Evidence from United States and Eurozone. Panoeconomicus, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN161208007M. · DOI
- Jordà, O. (2005) Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review 95(1): 161-182.
- Kaplan, G., Moll, B. and Violante, G. (2018) Monetary policy according to HANK. American Economic Review 108(3): 697-743.
- Kirschenmann, K., Malinen, T. and Nyberg, H. (2016) The risk of financial crises: is there a role for income inequality? Journal of International Money and Finance 68(C): 161-180.
- Krippner, L. (2015) Zero Lower Bound Term Structure Modeling. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
- Krueger, D., Mitman, K. and Perri, F. (2016) Macroeconomics and household heterogeneity. In H. Uhlig and J. Taylor (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics (Vol 2B, Chapter 11, pp. 843-921). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
- Krusell, P. and Smith, A.A. Jr. (1998) Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy. Journal of Political Economy 106: 867-896.
- Kumhof, M., Ranciere, R. and Winant, P. (2015) Inequality, leverage, and crises. American Economic Review 105(3): 1217-1245.
- Meh, C., Rios-Rull, J. and Terajima, Y. (2010) Aggregate and welfare effects of redistribution of wealth under inflation and price-level targeting. Journal of Monetary Economics 57(6): 637-652.
- Mendicino, C., Nikolov, K., Suarez, J. and Supera, D. (2018) Optimal dynamic capital requirements. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 50(6): 1271-1297.
- Menna, L. and Tirelli, P. (2017) Optimal inflation to reduce inequality. Review of Economic Dynamics 24: 79-94.
- Mumtaz, H. and Theophilopoulou, A. (2017). The impact of monetary policy on inequality in the UK. An empirical analysis. European Economic Review 98: 410-423.
- Perugini, C., Hölscher, J. and Collie, S. (2016) Inequality, credit and financial crises. Cambridge Journal of Economics 40(1): 227-257.
- Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
- Piketty, T., Saez, E. and Zucman, G. (2016) Distributional national accounts: methods and estimates for the United States. NBER Working Paper 22945, National Bureau for Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Journal of Economic Surveys (2019) Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 1199-1231
- C 2019 The Authors. Journal of Economic Surveys published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Punzi, M.T. and Rabitsch, K. (2018) Effectiveness of macroprudential policies under borrower heterogeneity. Journal of International Money and Finance 85: 251-261.
- Romer, C.D. and Romer, D. (1999) Monetary policy and the well-being of the poor. Economic Review QI: 21-49.
- Romer, C.D. and Romer, D. (2004) A new measure of monetary shocks: derivation and implications. American Economic Review 94(4): 1055-1084.
- Rubio, M. and Carrasco-Gallego, J.A. (2014) Macroprudential and monetary policies: implications for financial stability and welfare. Journal of Banking and Finance 49(C): 326-336.
- Saiki, A. and Frost, J. (2014) Does unconventional monetary policy affect inequality? Evidence from Japan. Applied Economics 46(36): 4445-4454.
- Stiglitz, J.E. (2015) New theoretical perspectives on the distribution of income and wealth among individuals: part IV: land and credit. NBER Working Paper 21192, National Bureau for Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
- Sturm, J.-E. and de Haan, J. (2015) Income inequality, capitalism and ethno-linguistic fractionalization. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 105: 593-597.
- Van Treeck, T. (2014) Did inequality cause the U.S. financial crisis? Journal of Economic Surveys 28(3): 421-448.
- Voinea, L., Lovin, H. and Cojocaru, A. (2018) The impact of inequality on the transmission of monetary policy. Journal of International Money and Finance 85: 236-250.
- Vermeulen, P. (2016). Estimating the top tail of the wealth distribution. American Economic Review 106(5): 646-650.
- Wu, J.C. and Xia, F.D. (2016) Measuring the macroeconomic impact of monetary policy at the Zero Lower Bound. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 48(2-3): 253-291.
- Yogo, M. (2004) Estimating the elasticity of intertemporal substitution when instruments are weak. Review of Economics and Statistics 86(3): 797-810.
- Zinman, J. (2010). Restricting consumer credit access: household survey evidence on effects around the Oregon rate cap. Journal of Banking and Finance 34(3): 546-556.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Poverty, racism, and the public health crisis in America
Beech, B. M., Ford, C., Thorpe, R. J., Bruce, M. A., & Norris, K. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.699049 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Independent Agencies, Distribution, and Legitimacy: The Case of Central Banks
DIETSCH, P. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055419000790 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Colciago, A., Samarina, A., & de Haan, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- De Nederlandsche Bank Amsterdam
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Surveys
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-13
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1199-1231
- ISSN
- 0950-0804 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6419
- OpenAlex
- W2808322056
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 58.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Surveys (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
- Keywords
- central bank policy, income inequality, wealth inequality, monetary policy, distributional effects of monetary policy, price stickiness, incomplete markets, household heterogeneity, unconventional monetary policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review