The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological distress in post‐partum women after non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Japan
Abstract
Aim: The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of psychological mental distress in post‐partum women after non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Japan. Methods: Psychological mental distress was assessed using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6). We compared patients with (i) low pre‐NIPT K6 and low post‐partum K6 scores (control group), and (ii) low pre‐NIPT K6 and a high post‐partum K6 scores (case group). Results: Among the 697 women who underwent NIPT, 29 (4.2%) had low pre‐NIPT K6 and high post‐partum K6 scores (case group) and 668 (95.8%) had low pre‐NIPT K6 and low post‐partum K6 scores (control). Among women with negative NIPT findings, post‐partum women with a high K6 score were compared to a control group of women with a low K6 score. Logistic regression analysis showed that primiparity (P = 0.007), low birthweight (P = 0.005) and use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (P = 0.02) and assisted reproductive technology (P = 0.05) were significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: Even if women do not feel mental distress before NIPT, they may develop mental stress post‐partum. In particular, primipara women who conceived through assisted reproductive technology (especially intracytoplasmic sperm injection) and gave birth to a low birthweight baby were more susceptible to developing post‐partum distress. Thus, it is important to educate women that support is available, with consultation with other healthcare professionals during genetic counseling if necessary. Further studies are needed in order to determine the factors associated with post‐partum mental distress.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Five studies assessed anxiety, psychological distress and/or decisional regret with validated psychological tests like the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI or short form STAI-6), the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised (PRAQ-R), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) or the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) [20–24].”
From Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review (2019) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“In this scoping review, we identified seven studies that investigated psychological and/or social consequences after NIPT [19–25].”
From Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review (2019) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,987
Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics
Kanda, Y. (2012) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/bmt.2012.244 · Cited by 18,876
The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan
Furukawa, T. A., Kawakami, N., Saitoh, M., Ono, Y., Nakane, Y., Nakamura, Y., Tachimori, H., Iwata, N., Uda, H., Nakane, H., et al. (2008) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.257 · Cited by 1,478
Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period
Howard, L. M., Molyneaux, E., Dennis, C.-L., Rochat, T., Stein, A., & Milgrom, J. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61276-9 · Cited by 1,328
The R Commander: A Basic-Statistics Graphical User Interface to R
Fox, J. (2005) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v014.i09 · Cited by 1,098
The Risk of Major Birth Defects after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and in Vitro Fertilization
Hansen, M., Kurinczuk, J. J., Bower, C. I., & Webb, S. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010035 · Cited by 1,077
Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defects
Davies, M. J., Moore, V., Willson, K. J., ESSEN, P. V., Priest, K., Scott, H. M., Haan, E., & Chan, A. C. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1008095 · Cited by 806
Palomaki, G. E., Deciu, C., Kloza, E. M., Lambert-Messerlian, G. M., Haddow, J. E., Neveux, L. M., Ehrich, M., van den Boom, D., Bombard, A. T., Grody, W. W., et al. (2012) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2011.73 · Cited by 518
Källén, B. A. J., Finnström, O., Nygren, K. G., & Olausson, P. O. (2005) · Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology · doi:10.1002/bdra.20107 · Cited by 244
Postpartum Depression: A Review
Patel, M., Bailey, R. K., Jabeen, S., Ali, S., Barker, N. C., & Osiezagha, K. (2012) · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved · doi:10.1353/hpu.2012.0037 · Cited by 194
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Saito H, 2012, ART in Japan, Curr Inform Matern Child Health, 66, 13
Cited by
Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
Labonté, V., Alsaid, D., Lang, B., & Meerpohl, J. J. (2019) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2518-x · Cited by 39
Bowman‐Smart, H., Gyngell, C., Mand, C., Amor, D. J., Delatycki, M. B., & Savulescu, J. (2021) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2021.1996659 · Cited by 33
Reinsch, S., König, A., & Rehmann‐Sutter, C. (2020) · New Genetics and Society · doi:10.1080/14636778.2020.1805305 · Cited by 24
Kang, C.-M. (2019) · Journal of the Chinese Medical Association · doi:10.1097/jcma.0000000000000220 · Cited by 10
Fetal information as shared information: using NIPT to test for adult-onset conditions
Bowman‐Smart, H., & Taylor-Sands, M. M. (2021) · Bioethics News · doi:10.1007/s40592-021-00142-4 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Takeda, E., Suzumori, N., Ebara, T., Yotsumoto, J., Kumagai, K., Oseto, K., Numabe, H., & Sugiura‐Ogasawara, M.
- Affiliations
- Ochanomizu University (JP)
- Nagoya City University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Suzumori, Nobuhiro
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-13
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-42
- ISSN
- 1341-8076 (ISSN-L)
- 1447-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2764134657
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- postpartum psychological distress, non-invasive prenatal testing, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, primiparity, low birth weight, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, assisted reproduction, genetic counseling, maternal mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Japan, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Puerperal Disorders, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
