Comparative performance of various human papillomavirus assays available in Korea for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher lesions among available human papillomavirus infection (HPV) genotyping tests in Korea. Methods: Eligible patients visited 13 tertiary hospitals for colposcopic biopsy following cervical cytology and HPV genotyping test between January and December 2018. Baseline characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), and parity were collected from 3798 patients. The performance of the Roche Cobas HPV 4800 was evaluated against other domestic HPV assays to detect CIN2 or higher. Results: A total of seven types of HPV genotyping tests were analyzed in the research institutes. A total of 1358 patients (35.8%) tested Anyplex II HPV 28 and 701 patients (18.5%) tested Cobas 4800 HPV. The overall sensitivity in the detection of CIN2 or higher was 41.5% (38.9–44.1) in patients positive for HPV 16/18. The Cobas test for HPV 16/18 was concordant with other assays evaluated for detection of CIN2 or higher and showed sensitivity of 46.6%, which was not significantly different from other assays. Although Anyplex II HPV28 (Seegene) showed slightly decreased sensitivity for detecting CIN2 or higher lesion with HPV 16/18 positive (39.8%, p < 0.05) compared to Cobas 4800, in aspect of high‐risk HPV positive, Anyplex II HPV28 showed increased sensitivity (96.9%, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The performance of the HPV genotype test that were commonly used in Korea was concordant with Cobas HPV test. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety, efficiency, and cost‐effectiveness of the various commercially available domestic HPV assays.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Roche Cobas 4800 assay is known for having relatively high sensitivity compared with other HPV assays.
“as shown by multiple previous studies, the Roche Cobas 4800 assay is known for having a relatively high sensitivity compared with other HPV assays (12, 13, 17).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bell, M., Verberckmoes, B., Devolder, J., Vermandere, H., Degomme, O., Guimarães, Y. M., Godoy, L. R., Ambrosino, E., Cools, P., & Padalko, E. (2023) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00081-23 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“However, as shown by multiple previous studies, the Roche Cobas 4800 assay is known for having a relatively high sensitivity compared with other HPV assays (12, 13, 17).”
Method
- Authors
- Ouh, Y., Park, J. J., Kang, M., Kim, M., Song, J. Y., Shin, S. J., Shim, S., Yoo, H. J., Lee, M., Lee, S., Shin, W., Chong, G. O., Choi, M. C., Choi, C. H., & Min, K.
- Affiliations
- Kangwon National University (KR)
- National Evidenc- based healthcare Collaborating Agency (KR)
- CHA University (KR)
- Korea University Anam Hospital (KR)
- Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center (KR)
- Konkuk University Medical Center (KR)
- Chungnam National University Hospital (KR)
- Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
- The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital (KR)
- CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR)
- Samsung Medical Center (KR)
- Korea University Ansan Hospital (KR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-10-28
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 207-214
- ISSN
- 1341-8076 (ISSN-L)
- 1447-0756
- OpenAlex
- W3210109197
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- HPV genotyping, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, HPV 16/18, diagnostic sensitivity, assay comparison, high-risk HPV, cervical cancer screening
- MeSH terms
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Genotype, Humans, Pregnancy, Sensitivity and Specificity, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Human papillomavirus 18, Human papillomavirus 16, Alphapapillomavirus, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review