Cited by 82Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerHeat shock proteins research

Pharmacological reactivation of p53 as a strategy to treat cancer

Open access
Zawacka‐Pankau, J., Selivanova, G.·2015·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

It has been confirmed through studies using the technique of unbiased sequencing that the TP53 tumour suppressor is the most frequently inactivated gene in cancer. This finding, together with results from earlier studies, provides compelling evidence for the idea that p53 ablation is required for the development and maintenance of tumours. Genetic reconstitution of the function of p53 leads to the suppression of established tumours as shown in mouse models. This strongly supports the notion that p53 reactivation by small molecules could provide an efficient strategy to treat cancer. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the development of small molecules that restore the function of mutant p53 by different mechanisms, including stabilization of its folding by A pr‐246, which is currently being tested in a Phase II clinical trial. We discuss several classes of compounds that reactivate wild‐type p53, such as Mdm2 inhibitors, which are currently undergoing clinical testing, MdmX inhibitors and molecules targeting factors upstream of Mdm2/X or p53 itself. Finally, we consider the clinical applications of compounds targeting p53 and the p53 pathway.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joim.12336

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several small molecules have been identified that inactivate mutant p53 or restore WT p53 response in mutant p53 protein including PRIMA-1, MIRA-1, Elipticin, CDB3, WR1065, NSC319726, p53R3 and CP-31398, although their mechanisms of action in many cases remain to be clarified.

    “Over the past decade, several small molecules have been identified that inactivate mutant p53 or restore WT p53 response in mutant p53 protein including PRIMA-1, MIRA-1, Elipticin, CDB3, WR1065, NSC319726, p53R3 and CP-31398, although their mechanisms of action in many cases remain to be clarified [9].”

    From Ligand dependent restoration of human TLR3 signaling and death in p53 mutant cells (2016) · cites this paper as [9]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Vousden KH, Prives C. Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell 2009; 137: 413-31.
  2. Sjoblom T, Jones S, Wood LD et al. The consensus coding sequences of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science 2006; 314: 268-74.
  3. Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Polak P et al. Mutational hetero- geneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 2013; 499: 214-8.
  4. Christophorou MA, Martin-Zanca D, Soucek L et al. Temporal dissection of p53 function in vitro and in vivo. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 718-26.
  5. Leroy B, Fournier JL, Ishioka C et al. The TP53 website: an integrative resource centre for the TP53 mutation database and TP53 mutant analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: D962-9.
  6. Strano S, Dell'Orso S, Mongiovi AM et al. Mutant p53 proteins: between loss and gain of function. Head Neck 2007; 29: 488-96.
  7. Alsner J, Jensen V, Kyndi M et al. A comparison between p53 accumulation determined by immunohistochemistry and TP53 mutations as prognostic variables in tumours from breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2008; 47: 600-7.
  8. Lang GA, Iwakuma T, Suh YA et al. Gain of function of a p53 hot spot mutation in a mouse model of Li-Fraumeni syn- drome. Cell 2004; 119: 861-72.
  9. Terzian T, Suh YA, Iwakuma T et al. The inherent instability of mutant p53 is alleviated by Mdm2 or p16INK4a loss. Genes Dev 2008; 22: 1337-44.
  10. Muller PA, Vousden KH. Mutant p53 in cancer: new func- tions and therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Cell 2014; 25: 304-17.
  11. Malkin D. p53 and the Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1993; 66: 83-92.
  12. Soussi T, Beroud C. Assessing TP53 status in human tumours to evaluate clinical outcome. Nat Rev Cancer 2001; 1: 233-40.
  13. Strano S, Dell'Orso S, Di Agostino S, Fontemaggi G, Sacchi A, Blandino G. Mutant p53: an oncogenic transcription factor. Oncogene 2007; 26: 2212-9.
  14. Li Y, Prives C. Are interactions with p63 and p73 involved in mutant p53 gain of oncogenic function? Oncogene 2007; 26: 2220-5.
  15. Feldser DM, Kostova KK, Winslow MM et al. Stage-specific sensitivity to p53 restoration during lung cancer progression. Nature 2010; 468: 572-5.
  16. Junttila MR, Karnezis AN, Garcia D et al. Selective activation of p53-mediated tumour suppression in high-grade tumours. Nature 2010; 468: 567-71.
  17. Roth JA, Nguyen D, Lawrence DD et al. Retrovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer to tumors of patients with lung cancer. Nat Med 1996; 2: 985-91.
  18. Khoo KH, Verma CS, Lane DP. Drugging the p53 pathway: understanding the route to clinical efficacy. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 2014; 13: 217-36.
  19. Maslon MM, Hupp TR. Drug discovery and mutant p53. Trends Cell Biol 2010; 20: 542-55.
  20. Selivanova G, Iotsova V, Okan I et al. Restoration of the growth suppression function of mutant p53 by a synthetic peptide derived from the p53 C-terminal domain. Nat Med 1997; 3: 632-8.
  21. Snyder EL, Meade BR, Saenz CC, Dowdy SF. Treatment of terminal peritoneal carcinomatosis by a transducible p53-activating peptide. PLoS Biol 2004; 2: E36.
  22. Cohen PA, Hupp TR, Lane DP, Daniels DA. Biochemical charac- terization of different conformational states of the Sf9 cell-puri- fied p53His175 mutant protein. FEBS Lett 1999; 463: 179-84.
  23. Liu WL, Midgley C, Stephen C, Saville M, Lane DP. Biological significance of a small highly conserved region in the N terminus of the p53 tumour suppressor protein. J Mol Biol 2001; 313: 711-31.
  24. Friedler A, Hansson LO, Veprintsev DB et al. A peptide that binds and stabilizes p53 core domain: chaperone strategy for rescue of oncogenic mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 937-42.
  25. Issaeva N, Friedler A, Bozko P, Wiman KG, Fersht AR, Selivanova G. Rescue of mutants of the tumor suppressor p53 in cancer cells by a designed peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 13303-7.
  26. Li D, Marchenko ND, Moll UM. SAHA shows preferential cytotoxicity in mutant p53 cancer cells by destabilizing mutant p53 through inhibition of the HDAC6-Hsp90 chaper- one axis. Cell Death Differ 2011; 18: 1904-13.
  27. Li D, Marchenko ND, Schulz R et al. Functional inactivation of endogenous MDM2 and CHIP by HSP90 causes aberrant stabilization of mutant p53 in human cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 2011; 9: 577-88.
  28. Boeckler FM, Joerger AC, Jaggi G, Rutherford TJ, Veprintsev DB, Fersht AR. Targeted rescue of a destabilized mutant of p53 by an in silico screened drug. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 10360-5.
  29. Liu X, Wilcken R, Joerger AC et al. Small molecule induced reactivation of mutant p53 in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: 6034-44.
  30. Bykov VJ, Issaeva N, Zache N et al. Reactivation of mutant p53 and induction of apoptosis in human tumor cells by maleimide analogs. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 30384-91.
  31. Liang Y, Besch-Williford C, Hyder SM. PRIMA-1 inhibits growth of breast cancer cells by re-activating mutant p53 protein. Int J Oncol 2009; 35: 1015-23.
  32. Zandi R, Selivanova G, Christensen CL, Gerds TA, Willumsen BM, Poulsen HS. PRIMA-1Met/APR-246 induces apoptosis and tumor growth delay in small cell lung cancer expressing mutant p53. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17: 2830-41.
  33. Saha MN, Jiang H, Yang Y, Reece D, Chang H. PRIMA-1Met/ APR-246 displays high antitumor activity in multiple mye- loma by induction of p73 and Noxa. Mol Cancer Ther 2013; 12: 2331-41.
  34. Bao W, Chen M, Zhao X et al. PRIMA-1Met/APR-246 induces wild-type p53-dependent suppression of malignant mela- noma tumor growth in 3D culture and in vivo. Cell Cycle 2011; 10: 301-7.
  35. Ali AY, Abedini MR, Tsang BK. The oncogenic phosphatase PPM1D confers cisplatin resistance in ovarian carcinoma cells by attenuating checkpoint kinase 1 and p53 activation. Oncogene 2012; 31: 2175-86.
  36. Wassman CD, Baronio R, Demir O et al. Computational identification of a transiently open L1/S3 pocket for reacti- vation of mutant p53. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 1407.
  37. Demma M, Maxwell E, Ramos R et al. SCH529074, a small molecule activator of mutant p53, which binds p53 DNA binding domain (DBD), restores growth-suppressive function to mutant p53 and interrupts HDM2-mediated ubiquitination of wild type p53. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 10198-212.
  38. Yu X, Vazquez A, Levine AJ, Carpizo DR. Allele-specific p53 mutant reactivation. Cancer Cell 2012; 21: 614-25.
  39. Loh SN. The missing zinc: p53 misfolding and cancer. Metallomics 2010; 2: 442-9.
  40. Puca R, Nardinocchi L, Bossi G et al. Restoring wtp53 activity in HIPK2 depleted MCF7 cells by modulating metallothionein and zinc. Exp Cell Res 2009; 315: 67-75.
  41. Pintus SS, Ivanisenko NV, Demenkov PS et al. The substitu- tions G245C and G245D in the Zn(2+)-binding pocket of the p53 protein result in differences of conformational flexibility of the DNA-binding domain. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2013; 31: 78-86.
  42. Issaeva N, Bozko P, Enge M et al. Small molecule RITA binds to p53, blocks p53-HDM-2 interaction and activates p53 function in tumors. Nat Med 2004; 10: 1321-8.
  43. Zhao CY, Szekely L, Bao W, Selivanova G. Rescue of p53 function by small-molecule RITA in cervical carcinoma by blocking E6-mediated degradation. Cancer Res 2010; 70: 3372-81.
  44. Zhao CY, Grinkevich VV, Nikulenkov F, Bao W, Selivanova G. Rescue of the apoptotic-inducing function of mutant p53 by small molecule RITA. Cell Cycle 2010; 9: 1847-55.
  45. Burmakin M, Shi Y, Hedstrom E, Kogner P, Selivanova G. Dual targeting of wild-type and mutant p53 by small molecule RITA results in the inhibition of N-Myc and key survival oncogenes and kills neuroblastoma cells in vivo and in vitro. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19: 5092-103.
  46. Trinidad AG, Muller PA, Cuellar J et al. Interaction of p53 with the CCT complex promotes protein folding and wild-type p53 activity. Mol Cell 2013; 50: 805-17.
  47. Rivlin N, Katz S, Doody M et al. Rescue of embryonic stem cells from cellular transformation by proteomic stabilization of mutant p53 and conversion into WT conformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 7006-11.
  48. Kravchenko JE, Ilyinskaya GV, Komarov PG et al. Small-mol- ecule RETRA suppresses mutant p53-bearing cancer cells through a p73-dependent salvage pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 6302-7.
  49. Lu C, Wang W, El-Deiry WS. Non-genotoxic anti-neoplastic effects of ellipticine derivative NSC176327 in p53-deficient human colon carcinoma cells involve stimulation of p73. Cancer Biol Ther 2008; 7: 2039-46.
  50. Saha MN, Chen Y, Chen MH, Chen G, Chang H. Small molecule MIRA-1 induces in vitro and in vivo anti-myeloma activity and synergizes with current anti-myeloma agents. Br J Cancer 2014; 110: 2224-31.
  51. Li Q, Lozano G. Molecular pathways: targeting Mdm2 and Mdm4 in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19: 34-41.
  52. Marine JC. MDM2 and MDMX in cancer and development. Curr Top Dev Biol 2011; 94: 45-75.
  53. Bond GL, Hu W, Bond EE et al. A single nucleotide polymor- phism in the MDM2 promoter attenuates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and accelerates tumor formation in humans. Cell 2004; 119: 591-602.
  54. Grinkevich V, Warnecke A, Selivanova G. p53-Reactivating Molecules as Research Tools and Anticancer Drugs. New York: Springer, 2013.
  55. Vassilev LT, Vu BT, Graves B et al. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Sci- ence 2004; 303: 844-8.
  56. Ding K, Lu Y, Nikolovska-Coleska Z et al. Structure-based design of spiro-oxindoles as potent, specific small-molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction. J Med Chem 2006; 49: 3432-5.
  57. Grasberger BL, Lu T, Schubert C et al. Discovery and cocrystal structure of benzodiazepinedione HDM2 antago- nists that activate p53 in cells. J Med Chem 2005; 48: 909-12.
  58. Zhao Y, Yu S, Sun W et al. A potent small-molecule inhibitor of the MDM2-p53 interaction (MI-888) achieved complete and durable tumor regression in mice. J Med Chem 2013; 56: 5553-61.
  59. Davydov IV, Woods D, Safiran YJ et al. Assay for ubiquitin ligase activity: high-throughput screen for inhibitors of HDM2. J Biomol Screen 2004; 9: 695-703.
  60. Sasiela CA, Stewart DH, Kitagaki J et al. Identification of inhibitors for MDM2 ubiquitin ligase activity from natural product extracts by a novel high-throughput electrochemiluminescent screen. J Biomol Screen 2008; 13: 229-37.
  61. Herman AG, Hayano M, Poyurovsky MV et al. Discovery of Mdm2-MdmX E3 ligase inhibitors using a cell-based ubiqui- tination assay. Cancer Discov 2011; 1: 312-25.
  62. Wang H, Ma X, Ren S, Buolamwini JK, Yan C. A small-mol- ecule inhibitor of MDMX activates p53 and induces apoptosis. Mol Cancer Ther 2011; 10: 69-79.
  63. Graves B, Thompson T, Xia M et al. Activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule-induced MDM2 and MDMX dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 11788-93.
  64. Lee JH, Zhang Q, Jo S et al. Novel pyrrolopyrimidine-based alpha-helix mimetics: cell-permeable inhibitors of pro- tein-protein interactions. J Am Chem Soc 2011; 133: 676-9.
  65. Vogel SM, Bauer MR, Joerger AC et al. Lithocholic acid is an endogenous inhibitor of MDM4 and MDM2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 16906-10.
  66. Enge M, Bao W, Hedstrom E, Jackson SP, Moumen A, Selivanova G. MDM2-dependent downregulation of p21 and hnRNP K provides a switch between apoptosis and growth arrest induced by pharmacologically activated p53. Cancer Cell 2009; 15: 171-83.
  67. Spinnler C, Hedstrom E, Li H et al. Abrogation of Wip1 expression by RITA-activated p53 potentiates apoptosis induction via activation of ATM and inhibition of HdmX. Cell Death Differ 2011; 18: 1736-45.
  68. Bernal F, Tyler AF, Korsmeyer SJ, Walensky LD, Verdine GL. Reactivation of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway by a stapled p53 peptide. J Am Chem Soc 2007; 129: 2456-7.
  69. Chang YS, Graves B, Guerlavais V et al. Stapled alpha-helical peptide drug development: a potent dual inhibitor of MDM2 and MDMX for p53-dependent cancer therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: E3445-54.
  70. Lohrum MA, Ludwig RL, Kubbutat MH, Hanlon M, Vousden KH. Regulation of HDM2 activity by the ribosomal protein L11. Cancer Cell 2003; 3: 577-87.
  71. Choong ML, Yang H, Lee MA, Lane DP. Specific activation of the p53 pathway by low dose actinomycin D: a new route to p53 based cyclotherapy. Cell Cycle 2009; 8: 2810-8.
  72. Rubbi CP, Milner J. Disruption of the nucleolus mediates stabilization of p53 in response to DNA damage and other stresses. EMBO J 2003; 22: 6068-77.
  73. Bywater MJ, Poortinga G, Sanij E et al. Inhibition of RNA polymerase I as a therapeutic strategy to promote cancer-spe- cific activation of p53. Cancer Cell 2012; 22: 51-65.
  74. Peltonen K, Colis L, Liu H et al. A targeting modality for destruction of RNA polymerase I that possesses anticancer activity. Cancer Cell 2014; 25: 77-90.
  75. Lain S, Hollick JJ, Campbell J et al. Discovery, in vivo activity, and mechanism of action of a small-molecule p53 activator. Cancer Cell 2008; 13: 454-63.
  76. Zhang Q, Zeng SX, Zhang Y et al. A small molecule Inauhzin inhibits SIRT1 activity and suppresses tumour growth through activation of p53. EMBO Mol Med 2012; 4: 298-312.
  77. Garcia H, Miecznikowski JC, Safina A et al. Facilitates chromatin transcription complex is an "accelerator" of tumor transformation and potential marker and target of aggressive cancers. Cell Rep 2013; 4: 159-73.
  78. Wallace M, Worrall E, Pettersson S, Hupp TR, Ball KL. Dual-site regulation of MDM2 E3-ubiquitin ligase activity. Mol Cell 2006; 23: 251-63.
  79. Vu B, Wovkulich P, Pizzolato G et al. Discovery of RG7112: a small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor in clinical development. ACS Med Chem Lett 2013; 4: 466-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zawacka‐Pankau, J., & Selivanova, G.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Zawacka‐Pankau, J.
  • Selivanova, G.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-26
Volume
277
Issue
2
Pages
248-259
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2066511043
Cited by
82
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Swedish Research Council
  • Swedish Cancer Society
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  • Polish Ministry of Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
p53 reactivation, TP53, mutant p53, small molecule p53 activators, APR-246, MDM2 inhibitors, p53 stabilization, p53 pathway, tumor suppressor inactivation, cancer therapy
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Neoplasms, Phenotype, Signal Transduction, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Treatment Outcome, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Mutation, Missense, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review