The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Legal Design for Practice, Activism, Policy, and Research
Open accessAbstract
This article offers an original integrated introduction to how to think about what design can do for law; where to find examples of legal design; and how to assess it. It identifies clear points of contact between lawyerly concerns and designerly skills, knowledge, and attitudes. It proposes that designerly ways can directly improve lawyerly communication; and that they can also generate new structured‐yet‐free spaces in which lawyers can be at once practical, critical, and imaginative. The article foregrounds the, hitherto unrecognized, diversity of existing legal design practice by drawing examples from across four fields of lawyering: legal practice, legal activism, policy making, and legal research. Emphasis is placed throughout on the need for a critical approach to legal design – that is, for legal design to be thought about and done with a commitment to avoiding, exposing, and remedying biases and inequalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Legal design, in turn, is an umbrella term for an approach that applies the principles of design thinking and design-based methods to the field of law (Perry-Kessaris, 2019).”
From Access to justice in public procurement: improving judicial review through lean thinking, proactive law and legal design (2025) · cites this paper as Perry-Kessaris, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Passera, S. (2015). ÔFlowcharts, swimlanes, and timelines Ð Alternatives to prose in communicating legal-bureaucratic instructions to civil servantsÕ. Journal of Technical and Business Communication. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 229-272.
- Office of the Parliamentary Counsel and Cabinet Office (2013) When laws become too complex. See also Curlotti, M. and McCreath, E. (2012) ÔEnhancing the Visualization of LawÕ. Paper presented at the 2012 Law via the Internet Twentieth Anniversary Conference, Cornell University, October 9, 2012. (Peer reviewed paper). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2160614.
Cited by
Kaave, P., Storsjö, I., & Heikkinen, P. (2025) · TalTech Journal of European Studies · doi:10.2478/bjes-2025-0009 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Perry‐Kessaris, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Perry‐Kessaris, Amanda
- Venue
- Journal of Law and Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-20
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-210
- ISSN
- 0263-323X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6478
- OpenAlex
- W3124936752
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 43.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Law and Society (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Education and Practice Innovations
- Social Sciences › Law › Law in Society and Culture
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Keywords
- legal design, legal practice, legal activism, legal research, critical design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
