The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High‐Resolution B‐Mode Ultrasound Reading Methods in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Cohort
Abstract
To measure the association of cardiovascular disease risk factors with carotid artery diameter and thickness of the intima and media in the general population, standardized ultrasound scanning and reading protocols were performed on 15,800 individuals in the multicenter Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. In a randomly selected subset of 855 participants, the mean artery diameter, minimum lumen diameter, and maximum near‐and far‐wall thicknesses were measured at a core laboratory from B‐mode image recordings of the common carotid, bifurcation, and internal carotid arteries to determine both within‐reader and between‐reader variability. Measurements associated with the wall thickness are sensitive indicators of reader reproducibility, with between‐reader reliability coefficients ranging from 0. 78 to 0.93 and coefficients of variation ranging from 13.1 to 18.3%. The percent of paired readings in the three carotid segments for which the absolute difference of the far‐wall thickness measured by different readers was no greater than one image pixel (0.067 mm) was 58% (common carotid), 53% (internal carotid), and 42% (bifurcation). Highly reproducible measurements of carotid artery dimensions can be achieved with standardized training and performance of ultrasound scanning and reading protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.
Fried, L. P., Borhani, N. O., Enright, P., Furberg, C. D., Gardin, J. M., Kronmal, R. A., Kuller, L. H., Manolio, T. A., Mittelmark, M. B., Newman, A., et al. (1991) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w · Cited by 3,652
Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging.
Pignoli, P., Tremoli, E., Poli, A., Oreste, P., & Paoletti, R. (1986) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.74.6.1399 · Cited by 2,404
Cited by
Chambless, L. E., Heiss, G., Folsom, A. R., Rosamond, W., Szklo, M., Sharrett, A. R., & Clegg, L. X. (1997) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009302 · Cited by 1,990
Self-citationFolsom, A. R., Wu, K. K., Rosamond, W. D., Sharrett, A. R., & Chambless, L. E. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1102 · Cited by 731
Self-citationInsulin Sensitivity and Atherosclerosis
Howard, G., O’Leary, D. H., Zaccaro, D., Haffner, S., Rewers, M., Hamman, R., Selby, J. V., Saad, M. F., Savage, P., & Bergman, R. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.93.10.1809 · Cited by 729
Howard, G., Sharrett, A. R., Heiss, G., Evans, G. W., Chambless, L. E., Riley, W. A., & Burke, G. L. (1993) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.24.9.1297 · Cited by 724
Self-citationJohn, U., Hensel, E., L�demann, J., Piek, M., Sauer, S., Adam, C., Born, G., Alte, D., Greiser, E., Haertel, U., et al. (2001) · Sozial- und Pr�ventivmedizin SPM · doi:10.1007/bf01324255 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Riley, W. A., Barnes, R. W., Bond, M. G., Evans, G., Chambless, L. E., & Heiss, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 168-172
- ISSN
- 1051-2284 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6569
- OpenAlex
- W2549741205
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐Resolution B‐Mode Ultrasound Reading Methods in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jon199114168
- The paper
- Riley, W. A., Barnes, R. W., Bond, M. G., Evans, G., Chambless, L. E., & Heiss, G. (1991). High‐Resolution B‐Mode Ultrasound Reading Methods in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Cohort. Journal of Neuroimaging. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon199114168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.