CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Healthcare RegulationNursing education and managementEthics in medical practice

Integrative Review of Studies about Nurses Who Have Been Disciplined by Their Professional Regulatory Bodies

Open access
Papinaho, Oili, Häggman‐Laitila, Arja, Liedenpohja, Anna‐Maija, Kangasniemi, Mari·2019·Journal of Nursing Management
DOI 10.1111/jonm.12883
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

AIM: To synthesize knowledge in studies about nurses who had been disciplined by their professional regulatory bodies. BACKGROUND: Unprofessional conduct that violates patient safety, nursing standards or legislation can result in disciplinary action that affects nurse's professional rights to practice. However, research on disciplinary procedures in nursing is fragmented. METHODS: An integrative review was carried out with systematic searches between January 2006 and November 2018, using the CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases and manual searches. The quality of the 17 included studies was evaluated with the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: The evidence in the included studies focused on various databases. Disciplined nurses were described in relation to their characteristics and disciplined because of numerous patients, practice and behaviour related violations. Similar disciplinary actions against nurses were reported. CONCLUSION: This review provides knowledge on contributory risk factors that can be used to develop professional standards and early interventions in nursing management. More systematic research is needed, together with clear definitions of disciplinary procedures. IMPLICATION FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This knowledge could strengthen the abilities of nurse managers to recognize and prevent events that seldom occur but seriously threaten the safety of patients and nurses when they do.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jonm.12883

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common consequences for diagnostic errors are error and warning records in the clinicians' personnel files, revocation or restriction of license, probation, and suspension.

    “Common consequences for diagnostic errors are error and warning records in the clinicians’ personnel files [141], revocation or restriction of license [259], probation, and suspension [260].”

    From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [260]

    The “Reasons for disciplinary action” section includes diagnosis-related errors, and “Disciplinary action” lists probation and suspension among sanctions for nurses. The copy does not establish that either is a common consequence specifically of diagnostic errors; the Discussion says serious licence sanctions such as suspension were infrequent. This citation is attached to probation and suspension, not to the earlier claims about personnel records or licence revocation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 20

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Azuri, P., Haron, Y., Riba, S., & Sar-Lev, S. (2014). Disciplinary procedures against israeli nurses. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 4(4), 51-56. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30117-4 · DOI
  2. Baca, M. (2009). Sexual boundaries: Are they common sense? Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 5(7), 500-505.
  3. Balestra, M. (2012). The best defense for registered nurses and nurse practitioners: Understanding the disciplinary process. Journal of Nursing Law, 15(2), 39-44.
  4. Beardwood, B. A., & Kainer, J. M. (2015). Exploring risk in professional nursing practice: An analysis of work refusal and professional risk. Nursing Inquiry, 22(1), 50-63. doi:10.1111/nin.12048 · DOI
  5. Benner, P., Sheets, V., Uris, P., Malloch, K., Schwed, K., & Jamison, D. (2002). Individual, practice, and system causes of errors in nursing: A taxonomy. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 32(10), 509-523.
  6. Benton, J. H., & Flynn, J. (2013). Identifying and minimizing risk exposures affecting nursing practice to enhance patient safety. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 3(4), 4-9. doi:10.1016/S2155- 8256(15)30179-4 · DOI
  7. Brecher, B. (2014). 'What is professional ethics?'. Nursing Ethics, 21(2), 239-244. doi:10.1177/0969733013484485 [doi · DOI
  8. Brous, E. (2008). The criminalization of unintentional error: Implications for TAANA. Journal of Nursing Law, 12(1), 5-12.
  9. Brous, E. (2012). Professional licensure: Investigation and disciplinary action. The American Journal of Nursing, 112(11), 53-60. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000422256.95706.9b · DOI
  10. Cady, R. F. (2009). Criminal prosecution for nursing errors. JONA's Healthcare Law, Ethics & Regulation, 11(1), 10-18. doi:10.1097/NHL. · DOI
  11. Chiarella, M., & Adrian, A. (2014). Boundary violations, gender and the nature of nursing work. Nursing Ethics, 21(3), 267-277. doi:10.1177/0969733013493214 [doi · DOI
  12. Clevette, A., Erbin-Roesemann, M., & Kelly, C. (2007). Nursing licensure: An examination of the relationship between criminal convictions and disciplinary actions. Journal of Nursing Law, 11(1), 5-11.
  13. Cooke, H. (2006a). Seagull management and the control of nursing work . Work, Employment and Society, 20(2), 223-243.
  14. Cooke, H. (2006b). Examining the disciplinary process in nursing: A case study approach. Work, Employment and Society, 20(4), 687-707. doi:10.1177/0950017006069809 · DOI
  15. Cronquist, R. (2013). Management of complaints against nurses: Review, investigation, action, resolution. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 4(1), 25-33. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30171-X · DOI
  16. da Silva, A. L., da Silva Candido, M. C., Duarte, S. J., & dos Santos, R. M. (2016). Complaints filed against nursing professionals. Nursing Ethics, 23(8), 889-901. doi:10.1177/0969733015587777 · DOI
  17. Donaldson, M. S., Corrigan, J. M., & Kohn, L. T. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human. Building a safer health system. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press. doi:9780309515634 Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.uef.fi:2443/lib/uef- ebooks/detail.action?docID=3375380
  18. Dunn, D. (2005). Substance abuse among nurses--defining the issue. AORN Journal, 82(4), 573-82, 585-8, 592-96; quiz 599-602.
  19. Epstein, P. M., Burns, C., & Conlon, H. A. (2010). Substance abuse among registered nurses. AAOHN Journal: Official Journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses, 58(12), 513-516.
  20. Evangelista, A., & Sims-Giddens, S. (2008). Gender differences in discipline of nurses in missouri. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 30(4), 501-514.
  21. Evans, S. (2010). Assessing and managing sexual misconduct. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 1(2), 52-56. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30352-5 · DOI
  22. Fischer, H. R., Houchen, B. J., & Ferguson-Ramos, L. (2008). Professional boundaries violations: Case studies from a regulatory perspective. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 317-323.
  23. Flook, D. M. (2003). The professional nurse and regulation. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing : Official Journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses, 18(3), 160-167. doi:S1089947203000856 [pii
  24. Garrett, B. M., & MacPhee, M. (2014). The slippery slope of nursing regulation: Challenging issues for contemporary nursing practice in Canada. Nursing Leadership (Toronto, Ont.), 27(3), 51-69.
  25. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 [doi · DOI · Paper page
  26. Harding, A. D. (2016). Nursing practice remediation: Administration and regulation. Nursing Management, 47(10), 10-11. doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000499563.34150. · DOI
  27. Hester, M. G., Green, A., Thomas, M. B., & Benton, M. (2011). Data analysis of texas RNs with multiple disciplinary actions. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 2(2), 51-56. doi:10.1016/S2155- 8256(15)30288-X · DOI
  28. Hewitt, P. (Ed.). (2007). Trust, assurance and safety -the regulation of health professionals in the 21st century. London: H.M. Stationary Office.
  29. Hudson, M. L., & Droppers, O. J. (2011). Licensed nurses disciplined in Oregon between September 1996 and June 2008. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 33(8), 1030-1046. doi:10.1177/0193945910384491 [doi · DOI
  30. Hudspeth, R. (2007). Survey of advanced practice registered nurses disciplinary action. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12(2), 7. doi:Volume122007/No2May07/ArticlePreviousTopics/APRNDisciplinaryActionSurvey.aspx
  31. Hudspeth, R. (2009). Understanding discipline of nurse practitioners by boards of nursing. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 5(5), 365-371.
  32. Härkänen, M., Turunen, H., Saano, S., & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2015). Detecting medication errors: Analysis based on a hospital's incident reports. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21(2), 141-146. doi:10.1111/ijn.12227 [doi · DOI
  33. Johnstone, M. J., & Kanitsaki, O. (2005). Processes for disciplining nurses for unprofessional conduct of a serious nature: A critique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(4), 363-371. doi:JAN3401 [pii
  34. Johnstone, M. J., & Kanitsaki, O. (2006). The ethics and practical importance of defining, distinguishing and disclosing nursing errors: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 367-376. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.04.010 · DOI
  35. Jones, J. S., Fitzpatrick, J. J., & Drake, V. K. (2008). Frequency of postlicensure registered nurse boundary violations with patients in the state of Ohio: A comparison based on type of prelicensure registered nurse education. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 22(6), 356-363. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2007.09.001 · DOI
  36. Kenward, K. (2008). Discipline of nurses: A review of disciplinary data 1996-2006. JONA'S Healthcare Law, Ethics and Regulation, 10(3), 81-84.
  37. Kuitunen, T., Kuisma, P., & Hoppu, K. (2008). Medication errors made by health care professionals. analysis of the Finnish poison information centre data between 2000 and 2007. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 64(8), 769-774. doi:10.1007/s00228-008-0496-4 [doi · DOI
  38. Kunyk, D. (2015). Substance use disorders among registered nurses: Prevalence, risks and perceptions in a disciplinary jurisdiction. Journal of Nursing Management, 23(1), 54-64. doi:10.1111/jonm.12081 [doi · DOI
  39. Maurits, E. E., de Veer, A. J., Groenewegen, P. P., & Francke, A. L. (2016). Dealing with professional misconduct by colleagues in home care: A nationwide survey among nursing staff. BMC Nursing, 15, 59-016-0182-2. eCollection 2016. doi:10.1186/s12912-016-0182-2 [doi · DOI
  40. McNelis, A. M., Horton-Deutsch, S., O'Haver Day, P., Gavardinas, T., Outlaw, C., Palmer, R., & Schroeder, M. (2012). Indiana state nurses assistance program: Identifying gender differences in substance use disorders. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 48(1), 41-46. doi:10.1111/j.1744- 6163.2010.00300.x · DOI
  41. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-9, W64. doi:0000605-200908180-00135 [pii
  42. Pastorius, D. (2007). Crime in the workplace, part 1. Nursing Management, 38(10), 18, 20, 22, 24, 26-27.
  43. Pierson, S., Hansen, R., Greene, S., Williams, C., Akers, R., Jonsson, M., & Carey, T. (2007). Preventing medication errors in long-term care: Results and evaluation of a large scale web- based error reporting system. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 16(4), 297-302. doi:16/4/297
  44. Pugh, D. (2009). The phoenix process: A substantive theory about allegations of unprofessional conduct. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(10), 2027-2037. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2648.2009.05038.x · DOI
  45. Raper, J. L., & Hudspeth, R. (2008). Why board of nursing disciplinary actions do not always yield the expected results. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 338-345.
  46. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Rouse, R. A., & Al-Maqbali, M. (2014). Identifying nurse managers' essential communication skills: An analysis of nurses' perceptions in oman. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(2), 192-200. doi:10.1111/jonm.12222 [doi · DOI
  48. Stone, K., Traynor, M., Gould, D., & Maben, J. (2011). The management of poor performance in nursing and midwifery: A case for concern. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(6), 803-809. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01219.x · DOI
  49. Strong, D. E. (2011). Access to enforcement and disciplinary data: Information practices of state health professional regulatory boards of dentistry, medicine and nursing. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 33(4), 534-570.
  50. Traynor, M., Stone, K., Cook, H., Gould, D., & Maben, J. (2014). Disciplinary processes and the management of poor performance among UK nurses: Bad apple or systemic failure? A scoping study. Nursing Inquiry, 21(1), 51-58. doi:10.1111/nin.12025 · DOI
  51. West, M. M. (2005). Early risk patterns in substance abuse impaired nurses. Pennsylvania Nurse, 60(4), 20-21.
  52. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. doi:JAN3621 [pii
  53. Wolf, Z. R. (2012). Nursing practice breakdowns: Good and bad nursing. Medsurg Nursing : Official Journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, 21(1), 16-22, 36.
  54. Zhong, E. H., Kenward, K., Sheets, V. R., Doherty, M. E., & Gross, L. (2009). Probation and recidivism: Remediation among disciplined nurses in six states. American Journal of Nursing, 109(3), 48-58. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000346931.36111. · DOI
  55. Zhong, E. H., & Thomas, M. B. (2012). Association between job history and practice error: An analysis of disciplinary cases. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 2(4), 16-18. doi:10.1016/S2155- 8256(15)30249-0 · DOI

Authors
Papinaho, O., Häggman‐Laitila, A., Liedenpohja, A., & Kangasniemi, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • The National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health (Valvira) Helsinki Finland
Corresponding author
Papinaho, Oili
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-28
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1588-1603
ISSN
  • 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2834
DOI
10.1111/jonm.12883
OpenAlex
W2975481539
Cited by
20
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
professional regulatory bodies, nurses, unprofessional behavior, patient safety, nursing standards, disciplinary proceedings, risk factors, early intervention, nurse managers
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Licensure, Nursing, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Nursing Process, Judicial Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review