Getting diversity at work to work: What we know and what we still don't know
Abstract
Diversity has the potential to significantly benefit organizations by leading to positive work outcomes when diversity ‘works’. Unfortunately, not only is our knowledge limited as to the necessary conditions and the mechanisms by which diversity affects individual, work performance and organizational outcomes, but we still know very little about which diversity management practices are most effective in promoting positive outcomes. We analyse the literature on diversity and its management, and describe how the seven papers included in this section advance our understanding of what organizations can do to get diversity at work to work. Our discussion points to the need for more research on how diversity at multiple levels affects work and organizational outcomes; the development of integrative theory which takes into account that diversity might not only engender separation and variety but also disparity; as well as to the need for more empirical attention to the climates or cultures that facilitate the positive effects of diversity on work and organizational outcomes. We suggest that future research should also identify those people management practices that are most powerful in the creation of a positive diversity climate, and the factors that moderate and underlie its effects on work and organizational outcomes. We conclude with proposals about how this might be achieved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Specific training programs focused on the development of a combination of cognitive understanding, social perceptiveness, and behavioral flexibility are more useful than overly broad programs.
“provide specific training programs that, for instance, focus on the development of (a combination of) cognitive understanding, social perceptiveness, and behavioral flexibility rather than overly broad programs (cf.Anand & Winters, 2008;Guillaume, Dawson, Woods, Sacramento, & West, 2013).”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Guillaume, Dawson, Woods, Sacramento, & West, 2013
Cites
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971 · see citing works
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700202 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Personality development and organizational behavior.
Roberts, B. W. (2006) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27001-1 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guillaume, Y. R. F., Dawson, J. F., Otaye‐Ebede, L., Woods, S. A., & West, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2040 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Self-citationLeading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000482 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guillaume, Y. R. F., Dawson, J. F., Woods, S. A., Sacramento, C. A., & West, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Aston University (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Guillaume, Yves R. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-15
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-141
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2129264536
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 22.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- British Psychological Society
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- workplace diversity, diversity management practices, employee performance, organizational outcomes, diversity climate, organizational culture, disparity, human resource management practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review