Cited by 143Gender Diversity and InequalityTeam Dynamics and PerformanceJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Getting diversity at work to work: What we know and what we still don't know

Guillaume, Yves R. F., Dawson, Jeremy F., Woods, Steve A., Sacramento, Claudia A., West, Michael A.·2013·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

Diversity has the potential to significantly benefit organizations by leading to positive work outcomes when diversity ‘works’. Unfortunately, not only is our knowledge limited as to the necessary conditions and the mechanisms by which diversity affects individual, work performance and organizational outcomes, but we still know very little about which diversity management practices are most effective in promoting positive outcomes. We analyse the literature on diversity and its management, and describe how the seven papers included in this section advance our understanding of what organizations can do to get diversity at work to work. Our discussion points to the need for more research on how diversity at multiple levels affects work and organizational outcomes; the development of integrative theory which takes into account that diversity might not only engender separation and variety but also disparity; as well as to the need for more empirical attention to the climates or cultures that facilitate the positive effects of diversity on work and organizational outcomes. We suggest that future research should also identify those people management practices that are most powerful in the creation of a positive diversity climate, and the factors that moderate and underlie its effects on work and organizational outcomes. We conclude with proposals about how this might be achieved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joop.12009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific training programs focused on the development of a combination of cognitive understanding, social perceptiveness, and behavioral flexibility are more useful than overly broad programs.

    “provide specific training programs that, for instance, focus on the development of (a combination of) cognitive understanding, social perceptiveness, and behavioral flexibility rather than overly broad programs (cf.Anand & Winters, 2008;Guillaume, Dawson, Woods, Sacramento, & West, 2013).”

    From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Guillaume, Dawson, Woods, Sacramento, & West, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guillaume, Y. R. F., Dawson, J. F., Woods, S. A., Sacramento, C. A., & West, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Aston University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Guillaume, Yves R. F.
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-15
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
123-141
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
OpenAlex
W2129264536
Cited by
143
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
22.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Psychological Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
workplace diversity, diversity management practices, employee performance, organizational outcomes, diversity climate, organizational culture, disparity, human resource management practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review