Morphine contributed to the deterioration of cancer via miR-543/MARCKS/FcγR-mediated phagocytosis pathway
Abstract
Objectives: It has been confirmed that morphine was detrimental to patients with cancers. Hence, we aimed to reveal a certain mechanism of morphine in cancer development. Methods: Microarray and GSEA analysis were utilized to seek for differently expressed genes and pathway. Key findings: Bioinformatics analysis identified that downregulation of MARCKS and upregulation of miR-543 in samples treated with morphine. FcγR-mediated phagocytosis pathway was illustrated to be upregulated in the control. PANC-1 and DU145 cell viability was increased but apoptosis was declined as morphine concentration went up from 10−8 to 10−6 mol/l. On the other curve, the viability was reduced and apoptosis was elevated from 10−6 to 10−5 mol/l. The expression of miR-543 ran the same trend as cell viability. Assays in vivo and in vitro validated that miR-543 facilitated cell viability, tumour growth, levels of CA199 and PSA, whereas inhibited apoptosis. MARCKS could target and inhibit miR-543 expression, which exhibited an opposite effect on cancer progression. MiR-543 blocked but MARCKS activated FcγR-mediated phagocytosis pathway. Conclusions: Morphine at 10−6 mol/l could benefit miR-543 expression to inhibit MARCKS expression, consequently, blocking FcγR-mediated phagocytosis pathway, which contributed to the cancer progression in vitro and in vivo.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
miR-543 suppresses FcγR expression, limiting FcγR contribution to antigen presentation.
“Luo et al. showed that miR-543 suppresses Fc-gamma receptor (FcγRs) expression limiting contribution of FcγRs to antigen-presentation [213].”
From MicroRNAs as Regulators of Phagocytosis (2022) · cites this paper as [213]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MicroRNAs as Regulators of Phagocytosis
Gierlikowski, W., & Gierlikowska, B. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11091380 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Luo, J., Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Tang, M., & Zhang, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Xudong
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-10-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1584-1598
- ISSN
- 0022-3573 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-7158
- OpenAlex
- W2966114160
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Keywords
- morphine, tumor progression, miR-543, MARCKS, apoptosis, cell viability, tumor growth, CA19-9, PSA, PANC-1 cells, DU145 cells, microRNA target regulation
- MeSH terms
- Myristoylated Alanine-Rich C Kinase Substrate, Animals, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Nude, Morphine, Phagocytosis, Signal Transduction, Down-Regulation, Up-Regulation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Apoptosis, Receptors, IgG, Computational Biology, MicroRNAs, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Mice, HEK293 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review