Periodontitis GWAS Reveal Immune‐Biased Heritability Without Gingival Cell‐Type Resolution
Open accessAbstract
Three methodologically distinct analyses partition periodontitis common-variant heritability across 27 gingival cell types. They agree on an immune-over-stromal direction but nominate three different top cell types, and a low-power analysis inverts the fibroblast signal; the current periodontitis GWAS therefore cannot resolve heritability to a single gingival cell type.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Plasma proteomic associations with genetics and health in the UK Biobank
Sun, B. B., Chiou, J., Traylor, M., Benner, C., Hsu, Y.-H., Richardson, T. G., Surendran, P., Mahajan, A., Robins, C., Vasquez-Grinnell, S. G., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06592-6 · Cited by 1,740 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Wang, C., An, W., Lin, M., Wang, Y., & Yang, G.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University Medical College Affiliated Stomatological Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Guoli
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontal Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-10-07
- ISSN
- 0022-3484 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0765
- OpenAlex
- W7220833253
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Periodontal Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101061)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Oral and gingival health research
- Keywords
- periodontitis, fibroblasts, genetic architecture, periodontal disease genetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review