Cited by 0Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyOral and gingival health research

Periodontitis GWAS Reveal Immune‐Biased Heritability Without Gingival Cell‐Type Resolution

Open access
Wang, Chengze, An, Wenyue, Lin, Mengna, Wang, Ying, Yang, Guoli·2026·Journal of Periodontal Research

Abstract

Three methodologically distinct analyses partition periodontitis common-variant heritability across 27 gingival cell types. They agree on an immune-over-stromal direction but nominate three different top cell types, and a low-power analysis inverts the fibroblast signal; the current periodontitis GWAS therefore cannot resolve heritability to a single gingival cell type.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jre.70179

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wang, C., An, W., Lin, M., Wang, Y., & Yang, G.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University Medical College Affiliated Stomatological Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Guoli
Venue
Journal of Periodontal Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-10-07
ISSN
  • 0022-3484 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0765
OpenAlex
W7220833253
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Periodontal Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101061)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Oral and gingival health research
Keywords
periodontitis, fibroblasts, genetic architecture, periodontal disease genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review