Cited by 31Veterinary Medicine and SurgeryVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Evaluation of owner experiences and adherence to home-cooked diet recipes for dogs

Johnson, L. N., Linder, D. E., Heinze, C. R., Kehs, R. L., Freeman, L. M.·2016·Journal of Small Animal Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate owner experiences and adherence to home‐cooked diet recipes for dogs. METHODS: Clients of a veterinary teaching hospital clinical nutrition service who had a home‐cooked diet recipe formulated for their dogs between March 2011 and December 2013 were given a survey by email, postal mail and telephone. Survey questions addressed motivations, positive and negative aspects of feeding home‐cooked diets and current feeding practices. Responses were compared to animals’ medical records to determine adherence. RESULTS: Of the 93 owners who were contacted, 53 (57%) completed the survey. Of the 53 respondents, 43 owners (81%) reported that they were still feeding an home‐cooked diet or had fed an home‐cooked diet until the time of their dogs’ deaths. The most common motivation for feeding a home‐cooked diet was suitability for specific medical needs. Of the 30 surveys that included a complete diet history, only four (13%) demonstrated exact adherence to home‐cooked diet recipes. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Most respondents liked and continued to feed a home‐cooked diet, but few owners adhered to prescribed recipes and many dogs required recipe modifications. It is important to counsel dog owners about benefits and drawbacks of feeding home‐cooked diets, importance of recipe adherence and necessity for follow‐up after diet formulation with a board‐certified veterinary nutritionist.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsap.12412

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, L. N., Linder, D. E., Heinze, C. R., Kehs, R. L., & Freeman, L. M.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Journal of Small Animal Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-23
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
23-27
ISSN
  • 0022-4510 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-5827
OpenAlex
W2166111988
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Small Animal Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
canine nutrition, dog owners, owner experience, veterinary nutrition, diet formulation, recipe modification
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Diet, Dogs, Female, Male, Massachusetts, Nutritional Requirements, Ownership, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cookbooks as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review