What a Bayesian Analysis Can Do for SLA: New Tools for the Sociolinguistic Study of Subject Expression in L2 Spanish
Abstract
This study constitutes the first statistical analysis to employ a Bayesian multinomial probit model in the investigation of subject expression in first and second language (L2) Spanish. The study analyzes the use of third‐person subject‐expression forms and demonstrates that the following variables are important for subject expression: perseveration, switch reference, number of the verb, specificity, verbal tense/mood/aspect, object pronoun, referent cohesiveness, the interaction of switch reference and referent cohesiveness, and the interaction of native language and four independent variables (number, specificity, tense/mood/aspect, and object pronoun). However, only certain parameters of these independent variables predicted use. The analysis highlights that, for advanced L2 speakers and native speakers, all forms of subject expression (i.e., lexical noun phrases, null subjects, personal pronouns, and other pronouns) allow variation and should be examined for a thorough understanding of subject expression in Spanish. The study offers theoretical and empirical evidence for the need to conduct cross‐disciplinary research in second language acquisition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bayesian models were suited for our analysis because the number of target words was not particularly large and weakly informative priors allow more reliable parameter estimation.
“Bayesian models were suited for our analysis because the number of target words was not particularly large and Bayesian analyses with weakly informative priors would allow us to more reliably estimate the parameters of interest (see Gudmestad, House, & Geeslin, 2013, for similar arguments in L2 research).”
From Effects of Availability, Contingency, and Formulaicity on the Accuracy of English Grammatical Morphemes in Second Language Writing (2022) · cites this paper as Gudmestad, House, & Geeslin, 2013
Cites
Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing
CANALE, M. (1980) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/1.1.1 · Cited by 4,021 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Murakami, A., & Ellis, N. C. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12500 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gudmestad, A., House, L., & Geeslin, K. L.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Indiana University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gudmestad, Aarnes
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-08
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 371-399
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W1492516878
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 25.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- subject expression, L2 Spanish, null subjects, switch-reference, object pronouns, verb number, specificity, perseveration, first language influence, second language acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review