Cited by 47Spanish Linguistics and Language StudiesEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

What a Bayesian Analysis Can Do for SLA: New Tools for the Sociolinguistic Study of Subject Expression in L2 Spanish

Gudmestad, Aarnes, House, Leanna, Geeslin, Kimberly L.·2013·Language Learning

Abstract

This study constitutes the first statistical analysis to employ a Bayesian multinomial probit model in the investigation of subject expression in first and second language (L2) Spanish. The study analyzes the use of third‐person subject‐expression forms and demonstrates that the following variables are important for subject expression: perseveration, switch reference, number of the verb, specificity, verbal tense/mood/aspect, object pronoun, referent cohesiveness, the interaction of switch reference and referent cohesiveness, and the interaction of native language and four independent variables (number, specificity, tense/mood/aspect, and object pronoun). However, only certain parameters of these independent variables predicted use. The analysis highlights that, for advanced L2 speakers and native speakers, all forms of subject expression (i.e., lexical noun phrases, null subjects, personal pronouns, and other pronouns) allow variation and should be examined for a thorough understanding of subject expression in Spanish. The study offers theoretical and empirical evidence for the need to conduct cross‐disciplinary research in second language acquisition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/lang.12006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bayesian models were suited for our analysis because the number of target words was not particularly large and weakly informative priors allow more reliable parameter estimation.

    “Bayesian models were suited for our analysis because the number of target words was not particularly large and Bayesian analyses with weakly informative priors would allow us to more reliably estimate the parameters of interest (see Gudmestad, House, & Geeslin, 2013, for similar arguments in L2 research).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gudmestad, A., House, L., & Geeslin, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Gudmestad, Aarnes
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-08
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
371-399
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
OpenAlex
W1492516878
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
25.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
subject expression, L2 Spanish, null subjects, switch-reference, object pronouns, verb number, specificity, perseveration, first language influence, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review