The Price of Civil Rights: Black Lives, White Funding, and Movement Capture
Abstract
What influence do funders have on the development of civil rights legal mobilization? Fundraising is critical to the creation, operation, and survival of rights organizations. Yet, despite the importance of funding, there is little systematic attention in the law and social movements and cause lawyering literatures on the relationship between funders and grantees. This article recovers a forgotten history of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's (NAACP) campaign to protect black lives from lynchings and mob violence in the early twentieth century. I argue that funders engaged in a process of movement capture whereby they used their financial leverage to redirect the NAACP's agenda away from the issue of racial violence to a focus on education at a critical juncture in the civil rights movement. The findings in this article suggest that activists tread carefully as the interaction between funders and social movement organizations often creates gaps between what activists want and what funders think movements should do.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Funders shaped the NAACP's early agenda away from addressing antidemocratic racial violence to segregation in education.
“This approach reflects resource realities: Those with resources can drive agendas, such as how funders shaped the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's (NAACP) early agenda away from addressing antidemocratic racial violence to segregation in education (Francis, 2019).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Francis, 2019
Cites
The Theory of Economic Regulation
Stigler, G. J. (1971) · The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science · doi:10.2307/3003160 · Cited by 8,098 · see citing works
Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma
Bell, D. A. (1980) · Harvard Law Review · doi:10.2307/1340546 · Cited by 2,574 · see citing works
Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship
Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2014) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226114040.001.0001 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Francis, M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Francis, Megan Ming
- Venue
- Law & Society Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 275-309
- ISSN
- 0023-9216 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5893
- OpenAlex
- W2911579082
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 32.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Law & Society Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Keywords
- civil rights movement, NAACP, motion capture, philanthropy, fundraising, racial violence, lynching, mob violence, cause lawyering, legal mobilization, African American activism, early 20th century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review