The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Will to Change: Lessons from Canada's Successful Decarceration of Youth
Abstract
In 1997, Canada's youth custodial facilities held 3825 sentenced youths. Eighteen years later, this number was 527—an 86 percent reduction. Overall youth imprisonment (sentenced + pretrial detention) decreased by approximately 73 percent. This paper uses Canada's successful decarceration of youths to understand what might be learned about decarceration more broadly. By examining the reforms that transpired in Canada's treatment of young offenders since the 1960s and the political/cultural shifts that occurred since the 1990s, we demonstrate that the decline resulted from changes occurring in various parts of the system. Finally, we contrast this decarceration with more than 60 years of relative stability of Canadian adult imprisonment rates as well as Canada's failure to substantially decrease youth pretrial detention in order to identify those factors seemingly necessary to reduce imprisonment more generally.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The overall decarceration rate of Canadian youth over the past two decades has not been applicable to Indigenous youth.
“The overall decarceration rate of Canadian youth (for about past two decades) has not been applicable to them (Webster et al., 2019).”
From Colonization, Normalization and Risk-Assessment: The Case of Youth Criminal Justice Act and Correctional Overrepresentation of Indigenous Youth in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as Webster et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Ruth, 2003, The Challenge of Crime: Rethinking our Response
- 1987, Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach
- 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00723.x · DOI
- Doob, 2013, The ‘Truth in Sentencing’ Act: The Triumph of Form over Substance, Canadian Criminal Law Review, 17, 365
- Webster, 2015, “Broken Bail” in Canada: How we Might Go about Fixing it
- 10.1177/1462474513506272 · DOI
- Webster, 2018, American Exceptionalism in Crime and Punishment
- Barnhorst, 2012, Canadian Criminal Justice Policy
- 10.1111/1745-9133.12097 · DOI
- Lipset, 1989, Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada
- 1975, Young Persons in Conflict with the Law
- 10.3138/cjccj.46.3.273 · DOI
- 10.1086/650186 · DOI
- 1996, Corrections Population Growth
- 10.1086/655338 · DOI
- 10.3138/cjcrim.40.2.185 · DOI
- 1977, Highlights of the Proposed New Legislation for Young Offenders
- 10.1111/chso.12087 · DOI
- Bala, 2012, Youth Criminal Justice Law
- Bala, 2015, Changing Professional Culture and Reducing Use of Courts and Custody for Youth, Saskatchewan Law Rev., 78, 127
- 10.1086/685755 · DOI
- 1996, A Review of the Young Offenders Act and the Youth Justice System in Canada
- 10.1111/lasr.12072 · DOI
- 10.1086/592807 · DOI
- 10.3138/cjccj.51.2.131 · DOI
- Taylor, 2017, International Handbook of Juvenile Justice
- 10.1177/1462474515590893 · DOI
- 10.1086/688456 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00266.x · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195181166.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.3138/cjcrim.38.3.271 · DOI
- Doob, 1998, An Exploration of Ontario Residents' Views of Crime and the Criminal Justice System
- 1979, Legislative Proposals to Replace the Young Offenders Act
- 10.3138/cjccj.2012.ES03 · DOI
- Zimring, 2002, A Century of Juvenile Justice
- 1965, Report: Juvenile Delinquency in Canada
- 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00757.x · DOI
- 10.1080/14043858.2012.740858 · DOI
- 10.1086/592812 · DOI
- 10.1080/14043850050116246 · DOI
- 10.1177/1462474506062106 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780195141016.001.0001 · DOI
- 1998, A Strategy for the Renewal of Youth Justice
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barmaki, R. (2025) · International Criminology · doi:10.1007/s43576-025-00170-8 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, C. M., Sprott, J. B., & Doob, A. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Webster, Cheryl Marie
- Venue
- Law & Society Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1092-1131
- ISSN
- 0023-9216 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5893
- OpenAlex
- W2990839517
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Law & Society Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Policy
- Keywords
- juvenile detention, pretrial detention, juvenile justice reform, Canada, sentencing policy, political and cultural change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review