Cited by 20Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Law and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Will to Change: Lessons from Canada's Successful Decarceration of Youth

Abstract

In 1997, Canada's youth custodial facilities held 3825 sentenced youths. Eighteen years later, this number was 527—an 86 percent reduction. Overall youth imprisonment (sentenced + pretrial detention) decreased by approximately 73 percent. This paper uses Canada's successful decarceration of youths to understand what might be learned about decarceration more broadly. By examining the reforms that transpired in Canada's treatment of young offenders since the 1960s and the political/cultural shifts that occurred since the 1990s, we demonstrate that the decline resulted from changes occurring in various parts of the system. Finally, we contrast this decarceration with more than 60 years of relative stability of Canadian adult imprisonment rates as well as Canada's failure to substantially decrease youth pretrial detention in order to identify those factors seemingly necessary to reduce imprisonment more generally.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/lasr.12433

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Ruth, 2003, The Challenge of Crime: Rethinking our Response
  2. 1987, Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach
  3. 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00723.x · DOI
  4. Doob, 2013, The ‘Truth in Sentencing’ Act: The Triumph of Form over Substance, Canadian Criminal Law Review, 17, 365
  5. Webster, 2015, “Broken Bail” in Canada: How we Might Go about Fixing it
  6. 10.1177/1462474513506272 · DOI
  7. Webster, 2018, American Exceptionalism in Crime and Punishment
  8. Barnhorst, 2012, Canadian Criminal Justice Policy
  9. 10.1111/1745-9133.12097 · DOI
  10. Lipset, 1989, Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada
  11. 1975, Young Persons in Conflict with the Law
  12. 10.3138/cjccj.46.3.273 · DOI
  13. 10.1086/650186 · DOI
  14. 1996, Corrections Population Growth
  15. 10.1086/655338 · DOI
  16. 10.3138/cjcrim.40.2.185 · DOI
  17. 1977, Highlights of the Proposed New Legislation for Young Offenders
  18. 10.1111/chso.12087 · DOI
  19. Bala, 2012, Youth Criminal Justice Law
  20. Bala, 2015, Changing Professional Culture and Reducing Use of Courts and Custody for Youth, Saskatchewan Law Rev., 78, 127
  21. 10.1086/685755 · DOI
  22. 1996, A Review of the Young Offenders Act and the Youth Justice System in Canada
  23. 10.1111/lasr.12072 · DOI
  24. 10.1086/592807 · DOI
  25. 10.3138/cjccj.51.2.131 · DOI
  26. Taylor, 2017, International Handbook of Juvenile Justice
  27. 10.1177/1462474515590893 · DOI
  28. 10.1086/688456 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00266.x · DOI
  30. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195181166.001.0001 · DOI
  31. 10.3138/cjcrim.38.3.271 · DOI
  32. Doob, 1998, An Exploration of Ontario Residents' Views of Crime and the Criminal Justice System
  33. 1979, Legislative Proposals to Replace the Young Offenders Act
  34. 10.3138/cjccj.2012.ES03 · DOI
  35. Zimring, 2002, A Century of Juvenile Justice
  36. 1965, Report: Juvenile Delinquency in Canada
  37. 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00757.x · DOI
  38. 10.1080/14043858.2012.740858 · DOI
  39. 10.1086/592812 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/14043850050116246 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/1462474506062106 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/oso/9780195141016.001.0001 · DOI
  43. 1998, A Strategy for the Renewal of Youth Justice

Metadata

Authors
Webster, C. M., Sprott, J. B., & Doob, A. N.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Webster, Cheryl Marie
Venue
Law & Society Review
Published
2019-12
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
1092-1131
ISSN
  • 0023-9216 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5893
OpenAlex
W2990839517
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Law & Society Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
juvenile detention, pretrial detention, juvenile justice reform, Canada, sentencing policy, political and cultural change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review