Cited by 19Bat Biology and Ecology StudiesAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMarine animal studies overview

Does body mass restrict call peak frequency in echolocating bats?

López‐Cuamatzi, Issachar L., Vega‐Gutiérrez, Víctor H., Cabrera‐Campos, Iván, Ruiz‐Sanchez, Eduardo, Ayala‐Berdon, Jorge, Saldaña‐Vázquez, Romeo A.·2020·Mammal Review

Abstract

Echolocation is the ability of some animals to orient themselves through sound emission and interpretation of the echoes. This is bats’ main sense for orientation and recognising biotopes that provide food, water, and roosts. It is widely accepted that echolocation call frequency is related to body mass, and this relationship has been described as the ‘allometric hypothesis’, which proposes a negative correlation between these variables. There is evidence that, in many cases, the allometric hypothesis does not apply. Additionally, studies supporting this hypothesis were done at the family level, resulting in a broad range of correlation values with r ranging from −0.36 to −0.76, and only insectivorous bats were included. Due to the notable exceptions and the lack of a quantitative synthesis of this hypothesis including all echolocating bats, we evaluated the allometric hypothesis of echolocation calls for this group. Using a meta‐analysis and phylogenetic generalised least‐squares techniques, we evaluated the relationship between echolocation call peak frequency and the body mass of bats. We found a negative relationship between body mass and echolocation call peak frequency for the 85 bat species that were included in our analysis (r = −0.3, p = 0.005). The relationship was consistent when we analysed the data at the insectivorous guild level, and in bats belonging to the families Vespertilionidae, Rhinolophidae, Emballonuridae, and the genus Myotis. However, the wide range…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mam.12196

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sex differences in American alligator bellows may be an example of size-signal allometry, whereby larger individuals produce lower frequency vocalisations, although this likely varies across species.

    “thus this may be an example of size‐signal allometry, whereby larger individuals produce lower frequency vocalisations, although this likely varies across species (Martin et al. 2017; López‐Cuamatzi et al. 2020).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 57 · Cited by 19

Authors
López‐Cuamatzi, I. L., Vega‐Gutiérrez, V. H., Cabrera‐Campos, I., Ruiz‐Sanchez, E., Ayala‐Berdon, J., & Saldaña‐Vázquez, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (MX)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala (MX)
  • Departamento de Botánica y Zoología Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias Universidad de Guadalajara Camino Ing. Ramón Padilla Sánchez 2100, Nextipac 45200 Zapopán Jalisco México
  • CONACyT Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala Carretera Tlaxcala‐Puebla Km. 1.5 C.P. 90062 Tlaxcala de Xicohténcatl Tlaxcala México
  • Ibero-American University Puebla (MX)
Corresponding author
Saldaña‐Vázquez, Romeo A.
Venue
Mammal Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
304-313
ISSN
  • 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2907
OpenAlex
W3036696249
Cited by
19
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mammal Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (C‐856/2018)
  • Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
echolocation, body mass, bats, insectivorous bats, sound production, Vespertilionidae, horseshoe bats, Emballonuridae, Myotis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review