The Redistribution of Reproductive Responsibility: On the Epigenetics of “Environment” in Prenatal Interventions
Abstract
The rapidly shifting field of epigenetics has expanded scientific understanding of how environmental conditions affect gene expression and development. This article focuses on two ongoing clinical trials—one in the United States and one in the United Kingdom—that have used epigenetics as the conceptual basis for testing the relationship between nutrition and obesity during pregnancy. Drawing on ethnographic research, I highlight the different ways that clinical scientists interpret epigenetics to target particular domains of the environment for prenatal intervention. Here I examine three environmental domains: the pregnant body, the home, and everyday experiences. In so doing, I show how different scientific approaches to epigenetics multiply concepts of “the environment,” while also individualizing responsibility onto pregnant bodies. Ultimately, I argue that how the environment is conceptualized in epigenetics is both a scientific and a political project that opens up questions of reproductive responsibility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The focus on pregnancy as a critical period for epigenetic modifications has increased the stakes of intervening on pregnant people diagnosed as overweight and obese in an attempt to control future health.
“The focus on pregnancy as a critical period for epigenetic modifications has increased the stakes of intervening on pregnant people diagnosed as overweight and obese in an attempt to control future health (Mansfield and Guthman 2015; Warin et al. 2015; Valdez 2018).”
From The Politics of Postgenomic Reproduction: Exploring Pregnant Narratives from within a Clinical Trial (2022) · cites this paper as Valdez 2018
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364 · see citing works
Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life
Barker, D. J. P., Godfrey, K. M., Gluckman, P. D., Harding, J. E., Owens, J. A., & Robinson, J. S. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)91224-a · Cited by 2,753 · see citing works
Holocaust Exposure Induced Intergenerational Effects on FKBP5 Methylation
Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N. P., Bierer, L. M., Bader, H. N., Klengel, T., Holsboer, F., & Binder, E. B. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.005 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (1991) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.001523 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Society: Don't blame the mothers
Richardson, S. S., Daniels, C. R., Gillman, M. W., Golden, J., Kukla, R., Kuzawa, C., & Rich-Edwards, J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/512131a · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental Politics of Reproduction
Lappé, M., Jeffries Hein, R., & Landecker, H. (2019) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011346 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The Politics of Postgenomic Reproduction: Exploring Pregnant Narratives from within a Clinical Trial
Valdez, N. (2022) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439211066759 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Valdez, N.
- Affiliations
- Wellesley College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Valdez, Natali
- ORCID
- Valdez, Natali
- Venue
- Medical Anthropology Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 425-442
- ISSN
- 0745-5194 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1387
- OpenAlex
- W2794038713
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Medical Anthropology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Fondation Brocher
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- epigenetics, prenatal intervention, reproductive responsibility, maternal nutrition, maternal obesity, pregnant body, family environment, everyday life, individualization of responsibility, environmental concepts, clinical trials, politics of science
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Environment, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, United States, Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Epigenesis, Genetic, Anthropology, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review