Cited by 117Birth, Development, and HealthRace, Genetics, and SocietyEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

The Redistribution of Reproductive Responsibility: On the Epigenetics of “Environment” in Prenatal Interventions

Valdez, Natali·2018·Medical Anthropology Quarterly

Abstract

The rapidly shifting field of epigenetics has expanded scientific understanding of how environmental conditions affect gene expression and development. This article focuses on two ongoing clinical trials—one in the United States and one in the United Kingdom—that have used epigenetics as the conceptual basis for testing the relationship between nutrition and obesity during pregnancy. Drawing on ethnographic research, I highlight the different ways that clinical scientists interpret epigenetics to target particular domains of the environment for prenatal intervention. Here I examine three environmental domains: the pregnant body, the home, and everyday experiences. In so doing, I show how different scientific approaches to epigenetics multiply concepts of “the environment,” while also individualizing responsibility onto pregnant bodies. Ultimately, I argue that how the environment is conceptualized in epigenetics is both a scientific and a political project that opens up questions of reproductive responsibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/maq.12424

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The focus on pregnancy as a critical period for epigenetic modifications has increased the stakes of intervening on pregnant people diagnosed as overweight and obese in an attempt to control future health.

    “The focus on pregnancy as a critical period for epigenetic modifications has increased the stakes of intervening on pregnant people diagnosed as overweight and obese in an attempt to control future health (Mansfield and Guthman 2015; Warin et al. 2015; Valdez 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valdez, N.
Affiliations
Wellesley College (US)
Corresponding author
Valdez, Natali
Venue
Medical Anthropology Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
425-442
ISSN
  • 0745-5194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1387
OpenAlex
W2794038713
Cited by
117
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Anthropology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Fondation Brocher
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
epigenetics, prenatal intervention, reproductive responsibility, maternal nutrition, maternal obesity, pregnant body, family environment, everyday life, individualization of responsibility, environmental concepts, clinical trials, politics of science
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Environment, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, United States, Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Epigenesis, Genetic, Anthropology, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review