The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contrasting primary successional trajectories of fungi and bacteria in retreating glacier soils
Abstract
Early community assembly of soil microbial communities is essential for pedogenesis and development of organic legacies. We examined fungal and bacterial successions along a well‐established temperate glacier forefront chronosequence representing ~70 years of deglaciation to determine community assembly. As microbial communities may be heavily structured by establishing vegetation, we included nonvegetated soils as well as soils from underneath four plant species with differing mycorrhizal ecologies (Abies lasiocarpa, ectomycorrhizal; Luetkea pectinata, arbuscular mycorrhizal; Phyllodoce empetriformis, ericoid mycorrhizal; Saxifraga ferruginea, nonmycorrhizal). Our main objectives were to contrast fungal and bacterial successional dynamics and community assembly as well as to decouple the effects of plant establishment and time since deglaciation on microbial trajectories using high‐throughput sequencing. Our data indicate that distance from glacier terminus has large effects on biomass accumulation, community membership, and distribution for both fungi and bacteria. Surprisingly, presence of plants rather than their identity was more important in structuring bacterial communities along the chronosequence and played only a very minor role in structuring the fungal communities. Further, our analyses suggest that bacterial communities may converge during assembly supporting determinism, whereas fungal communities show no such patterns. Although fungal communities provided little evidence of convergence in community structure, many taxa were nonrandomly distributed across the glacier foreland; similar taxon‐level responses were observed in bacterial communities. Overall, our data highlight differing drivers for fungal and bacterial trajectories during early primary succession in recently deglaciated soils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil pH mediates the balance between stochastic and deterministic assembly of bacteria
Tripathi, B. M., Stegen, J. C., Kim, M., Dong, K., Adams, J. M., & Lee, Y. K. (2018) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0082-4 · Cited by 1,049
Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome
Peay, K. G., Kennedy, P. G., & Talbot, J. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59 · Cited by 721
Liu, J., Sui, Y., Yu, Z., Shi, Y., Chu, H., Jin, J., Liu, X., & Wang, G. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.009 · Cited by 310
Dynamics of Ecological Communities Following Current Retreat of Glaciers
Ficetola, G. F., Marta, S., Guerrieri, A., Gobbi, M., Ambrosini, R., Fontaneto, D., Zerboni, A., Poulenard, J., Caccianiga, M., & Thuiller, W. (2021) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-010521-040017 · Cited by 112
Regional biogeography versus intra-annual dynamics of the root and soil microbiome
Bell-Dereske, L. P., Benucci, G. M. N., da Costa, P. B., Bonito, G., Friesen, M. L., Tiemann, L. K., & Evans, S. E. (2023) · Environmental Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40793-023-00504-x · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, S. P., & Jumpponen, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09-24
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 481-497
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2109395977
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrasting primary successional trajectories of fungi and bacteria in retreating glacier soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.12487
- The paper
- Brown, S. P., & Jumpponen, A. (2014). Contrasting primary successional trajectories of fungi and bacteria in retreating glacier soils. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.