Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing Symbiodinium diversity in scleractinian corals via next‐generation sequencing‐based genotyping of the ITS2 rDNA region

Open access
Arif, Chatchanit, Daniels, Camille, Bayer, Till, Banguera‐Hinestroza, Eulalia, Barbrook, Adrian, Howe, Christopher J., LaJeunesse, Todd C., Voolstra, Christian R.·2014·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

The persistence of coral reef ecosystems relies on the symbiotic relationship between scleractinian corals and intracellular, photosynthetic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium. Genetic evidence indicates that these symbionts are biologically diverse and exhibit discrete patterns of environmental and host distribution. This makes the assessment of Symbiodinium diversity critical to understanding the symbiosis ecology of corals. Here, we applied pyrosequencing to the elucidation of Symbiodinium diversity via analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS 2) region, a multicopy genetic marker commonly used to analyse Symbiodinium diversity. Replicated data generated from isoclonal Symbiodinium cultures showed that all genomes contained numerous, yet mostly rare, ITS 2 sequence variants. Pyrosequencing data were consistent with more traditional denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) approaches to the screening of ITS 2 PCR amplifications, where the most common sequences appeared as the most intense bands. Further, we developed an operational taxonomic unit (OTU)‐based pipeline for Symbiodinium ITS 2 diversity typing to provisionally resolve ecologically discrete entities from intragenomic variation. A genetic distance cut‐off of 0.03 collapsed intragenomic ITS 2 variants of isoclonal cultures into single OTU s. When applied to the analysis of field‐collected coral samples, our analyses confirm that much of the commonly observed Symbiodinium ITS 2 diversity can be attributed to intragenomic variation. We conclude that by analysing Symbiodinium populations in an OTU‐based framework, we can improve objectivity, comparability and simplicity when assessing ITS 2 diversity in field‐based studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mec.12869

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Arif, C., Daniels, C., Bayer, T., Banguera‐Hinestroza, E., Barbrook, A., Howe, C. J., LaJeunesse, T. C., & Voolstra, C. R.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-18
Volume
23
Issue
17
Pages
4418-4433
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2124360188
Cited by
235
References
1
FWCI
14.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Symbiodinium diversity in scleractinian corals via next‐generation sequencing‐based genotyping of the ITS2 rDNA region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.12869
The paper
Arif, C., Daniels, C., Bayer, T., Banguera‐Hinestroza, E., Barbrook, A., Howe, C. J., LaJeunesse, T. C., & Voolstra, C. R. (2014). Assessing Symbiodinium diversity in scleractinian corals via next‐generation sequencing‐based genotyping of the ITS2 rDNA region. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12869

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.