Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soil microbiome responses to the short‐term effects of Amazonian deforestation

Open access
Navarrete, Acacio A., Tsai, Siu M., Mendes, Lucas W., Faust, Karoline, de Hollander, Mattias, Cassman, Noriko A., Raes, Jeroen, van Veen, Johannes A., Kuramae, Eiko E.·2015·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Slash‐and‐burn clearing of forest typically results in increase in soil nutrient availability. However, the impact of these nutrients on the soil microbiome is not known. Using next generation sequencing of 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic DNA, we compared the structure and the potential functions of bacterial community in forest soils to deforested soils in the Amazon region and related the differences to soil chemical factors. Deforestation decreased soil organic matter content and factors linked to soil acidity and raised soil pH, base saturation and exchangeable bases. Concomitant to expected changes in soil chemical factors, we observed an increase in the alpha diversity of the bacterial microbiota and relative abundances of putative copiotrophic bacteria such as Actinomycetales and a decrease in the relative abundances of bacterial taxa such as Chlamydiae, Planctomycetes and Verrucomicrobia in the deforested soils. We did not observe an increase in genes related to microbial nutrient metabolism in deforested soils. However, we did observe changes in community functions such as increases in DNA repair, protein processing, modification, degradation and folding functions, and these functions might reflect adaptation to changes in soil characteristics due to forest clear‐cutting and burning. In addition, there were changes in the composition of the bacterial groups associated with metabolism‐related functions. Co‐occurrence microbial network analysis identified distinct phylogenetic patterns for forest and deforested soils and suggested relationships between Planctomycetes and aluminium content, and Actinobacteria and nitrogen sources in Amazon soils. The results support taxonomic and functional adaptations in the soil bacterial community following deforestation. We hypothesize that these microbial adaptations may serve as a buffer to drastic changes in soil fertility after slash‐and‐burning deforestation in the Amazon region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mec.13172

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Navarrete, A. A., Tsai, S. M., Mendes, L. W., Faust, K., de Hollander, M., Cassman, N. A., Raes, J., van Veen, J. A., & Kuramae, E. E.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-21
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
2433-2448
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2151670715
Cited by
190
References
5
FWCI
16.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil microbiome responses to the short‐term effects of Amazonian deforestation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.13172
The paper
Navarrete, A. A., Tsai, S. M., Mendes, L. W., Faust, K., de Hollander, M., Cassman, N. A., Raes, J., van Veen, J. A., & Kuramae, E. E. (2015). Soil microbiome responses to the short‐term effects of Amazonian deforestation. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13172

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.