Cited by 73Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

Model‐based detection and analysis of introgressed Neanderthal ancestry in modern humans

Open access
Steinrücken, Matthias, Spence, Jeffrey P., Kamm, John A., Wieczorek, Emilia, Song, Yun S.·2018·Molecular Ecology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Genetic evidence has revealed that the ancestors of modern human populations outside Africa and their hominin sister groups, notably Neanderthals, exchanged genetic material in the past. The distribution of these introgressed sequence tracts along modern‐day human genomes provides insight into the selective forces acting on them and the role of introgression in the evolutionary history of hominins. Studying introgression patterns on the X‐chromosome is of particular interest, as sex chromosomes are thought to play a special role in speciation. Recent studies have developed methods to localize introgressed ancestries, reporting long regions that are depleted of Neanderthal introgression and enriched in genes, suggesting negative selection against the Neanderthal variants. On the other hand, enriched Neanderthal ancestry in hair‐ and skin‐related genes suggests that some introgressed variants facilitated adaptation to new environments. Here, we present a model‐based introgression detection method called dical ‐ admix . We demonstrate its efficiency and accuracy through extensive simulations and apply it to detect tracts of Neanderthal introgression in modern human individuals from the 1000 Genomes Project. Our findings are largely concordant with previous studies, consistent with weak selection against Neanderthal ancestry. We find evidence that selection against Neanderthal ancestry was due to higher genetic load in Neanderthals resulting from small effective population size, rather than widespread Dobzhansky–Müller incompatibilities (DMIs) that could contribute to reproductive isolation. Moreover, we confirm the previously reported low level of introgression on the X‐chromosome, but find little evidence that DMIs contributed to this pattern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mec.14565

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous attempts to identify archaic fragments in contemporary humans have generally relied on existing archaic genomes, which partially represent the haplotypic diversity of archaic populations.

    “Previous attempts to identify archaic fragments in contemporary humans have generally relied on existing archaic genomes [14][15][16] , which partially represent the haplotypic diversity of the archaic populations.”

    From The nature of Neanderthal introgression revealed by 27,566 Icelandic genomes (2020) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction says ancient hominin genomes enable researchers to locate introgressed fragments, and Materials and Methods (Overview of our method) describes an earlier detection procedure that compares candidate segments with a reference Neanderthal genome. Those passages support the use of existing archaic genomes, but the paper does not say that such genomes represent only part of archaic populations’ haplotypic diversity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 65 · Cited by 73

Authors
Steinrücken, M., Spence, J. P., Kamm, J. A., Wieczorek, E., & Song, Y. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Department of Statistics University of California Berkeley CA, USA
  • Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Song, Yun S.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-17
Volume
27
Issue
19
Pages
3873-3888
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2952300719
Cited by
73
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10
FWCI
43.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01‐GM094402)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
Neanderthal introgression, Neanderthal ancestry, Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities, negative selection, genetic load, effective population size, adaptive introgression, 1000 Genomes Project
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Simulation, Genetics, Population, Humans, Hybridization, Genetic, Markov Chains, Models, Genetic, Population Density, Selection, Genetic, Genome, Human, Genetic Load, Chromosomes, Human, X, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review