Background selection and F ST : Consequences for detecting local adaptation
Abstract
Abstract Background selection is a process whereby recurrent deleterious mutations cause a decrease in the effective population size and genetic diversity at linked loci. Several authors have suggested that variation in the intensity of background selection could cause variation in F ST across the genome, which could confound signals of local adaptation in genome scans. We performed realistic simulations of DNA sequences, using recombination maps from humans and sticklebacks, to investigate how variation in the intensity of background selection affects F ST and other statistics of population differentiation in sexual, outcrossing species. We show that, in populations connected by gene flow, Weir and Cockerham's (1984; Evolution , 38 , 1358) estimator of F ST is largely insensitive to locus‐to‐locus variation in the intensity of background selection. Unlike F ST , however, d XY is negatively correlated with background selection. Moreover, background selection does not greatly affect the false‐positive rate in F ST outlier studies in populations connected by gene flow. Overall, our study indicates that background selection will not greatly interfere with finding the variants responsible for local adaptation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More recent simulations found that FST outliers were unlikely to be driven by background selection.
“This is consistent with more recent simulations, which found that FST outliers were unlikely to be driven by background selection (Matthey-Doret and Whitlock, 2019).”
From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Matthey-Doret and Whitlock, 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Matthey‐Doret, R., & Whitlock, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Matthey‐Doret, Remi
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3902-3914
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2966463892
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Ecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN‐2016‐03779)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (P1SKP3_168393)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Keywords
- background selection, FST, local adaptation, genome scan, genetic differentiation, Dxy, gene flow, false positive rate, deleterious mutations, recombination maps, stickleback, outcrossing species
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Computer Simulation, Humans, Recombination, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Genome, Human, Smegmamorpha
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review