Clarifying students’ feedback‐seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships
Abstract
Context Why and how do students seek feedback on their performance in the clinical workplace and which factors influence this? These questions have remained largely unanswered in research into workplace learning during clinical clerkships. Research on feedback has focused mainly on feedback providers. Whether and how feedback recipients actively seek feedback are under‐examined issues. Research in organisational psychology has proposed a mechanism whereby feedback seeking is influenced by motives and goal orientation mediated by the perceived costs and benefits of feedback. Building on a recently published model of resident doctors’ feedback‐seeking behaviour, we conducted a qualitative study to explore students’ feedback‐seeking behaviours in the clinical workplace. Methods Between April and June 2011, we conducted semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews with veterinary medicine students in Years 5 and 6 about their feedback‐seeking behaviour during clinical clerkships. In the interviews, 14 students were asked about their goals and motives for seeking feedback, the characteristics of their feedback‐seeking behaviour and factors influencing that behaviour. Using template analysis, we coded the interview transcripts and iteratively reduced and displayed the data until agreement on the final template was reached. Results The students described personal and interpersonal factors to explain their reasons for seeking feedback. The factors related to intentions and the characteristics of the feedback provider, and the relationship between the feedback seeker and provider. Motives relating to image and ego, particularly when students thought that feedback might have a positive effect on image and ego, influenced feedback‐seeking behaviour and could induce specific behaviours related to students’ orientation towards particular sources of feedback, their orientation towards particular topics for and timing of feedback, and the frequency and method of feedback‐seeking behaviour. Conclusions This study shows that during clinical clerkships, students actively seek feedback according to personal and interpersonal factors. Perceived costs and benefits influenced this active feedback‐seeking behaviour. These results may contribute towards the optimising and developing of meaningful educational opportunities during clerkships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Feedback works best for learning when the trainee has learning goals rather than performance goals.
“Feedback works best for learning when the trainee has learning goals rather than performance goals [17, 35]”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 155
- Authors
- Bok, H. G. J., Teunissen, P. W., Spruijt, A., Fokkema, J. P. I., van Beukelen, P., Jaarsma, D. A. D. C., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital (NL)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bok, Harold G J
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 282-291
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2134882130
- Semantic Scholar
- 01be863e1df54c4bd3671a5281d8b1e5c001057b
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 14.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- feedback-seeking behavior, clinical rotations, veterinary students, workplace learning, goal orientation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Animals, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Clerkship, Clinical Competence, Education, Veterinary, Feedback, Female, Goals, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Psychology, Social, Students, Health Occupations, Workplace, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Information Seeking Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review