The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Regional‐Supremacy Trap: Disorder in the Middle East
Abstract
This article analyzes the logic of recent instability and disorder in the Middle East. It offers two interrelated arguments. First, the region has turned into a battle zone in the aftermath of US retrenchment. The United States and other external powers refrained from direct engagement in shaping Middle Eastern order and, therefore, aspirant regional powers were prompted to redesign that order. Second, what makes instability and disorder a geopolitical feature of the Middle East is the “regional‐supremacy trap,” the seduction of a power vacuum and a desire for regional hegemony, a trap that draws all influential actors into a series of endless and cumulative conflicts. According to our findings, there is a meaningful relationship between the instability and the regional power struggle for supremacy in the post‐American Middle East. As there is no sign of cooperative mechanisms for shaping the regional order by the major Middle Eastern actors, the syndrome of disorder will continue for the foreseeable future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Yemen was also drawn into a regional proxy battle along the larger Sunni-Shia division as a result of the engagement of regional powers, particularly Iran and Gulf states led by Saudi Arabia (Mousavi Shafaee & Golmohammadi, 2022).”
From President Joe Biden’s Policy Shift: A Transformative Impact on Resolving the Yemen Conflict (2023) · cites this paper as Mousavi Shafaee & Golmohammadi, 2022
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
President Joe Biden’s Policy Shift: A Transformative Impact on Resolving the Yemen Conflict
Arshad, M. U. (2023) · Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences and Management Practices · doi:10.61503/cissmp.v2i2.34 · Cited by 3
“Yemen was also drawn into a regional proxy battle along the larger Sunni-Shia division as a result of the engagement of regional powers, particularly Iran and Gulf states led by Saudi Arabia (Mousavi Shafaee & Golmohammadi, 2022).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Mousavi Shafaee, S. M., & Golmohammadi, V.
- Venue
- Middle East Policy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-73
- ISSN
- 1061-1924 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-4967
- OpenAlex
- W4221048466
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Middle East Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
- Keywords
- Middle East instability, regional hegemony, power vacuum, regional order, great power competition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review