CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 89Seismic Performance and AnalysisVibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimization of Earthquake Energy Dissipation System by Genetic Algorithm

Open access
Hejazi, F., Toloue, I., Jaafar, M.S., Noorzaei, J.·2013·Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
DOI 10.1111/mice.12047
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Numerous recent studies have assessed the stability and safety of structures furnished with different types of structural control systems, such as viscous dampers. A challenging issue in this field is the optimization of structural control systems to protect structures against severe earthquake excitation. As the safety of a structure depends on many factors, including the failure of structural members and movement of each structural node in any direction, the optimization technique must consider many parameters simultaneously. However, the available literature on optimizing earthquake energy dissipation systems shows that most researchers have considered optimization processes using just one or a few parameters applicable only to simple SDOF or MDOF systems. This article reports on the development of a multiobjective optimization procedure for structural passive control systems based on genetic algorithm; this research focused on systems that would minimize the effects of earthquake based on realistic structural responses considering plastic hinge occurrence in structural elements and three-directional displacement in all structural nodes. The model was applied to an example of three-dimensional reinforced concrete framed building and its structural seismic responses were investigated. The results showed that the optimized control system effectively reduced the seismic response of structures, thus enhancing building safety during earthquake excitations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mice.12047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Adeli, 2004, Wavelet-hybrid feedback-least mean square algorithm for robust control of structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 128, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(128) · DOI
  2. Adeli, 1995, Concurrent structural optimization on massively parallel supercomputer, Journal of Structural Engineering, 121, 1588, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:11(1588) · DOI
  3. Adeli, 1997, Optimal control of adaptive/smart bridge structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 123, 218, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:2(218) · DOI
  4. Adeli, 1998, Integrated structural/control optimization of large adaptive/smart structures, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 35, 3815, 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00220-5 · DOI
  5. Akhand, 2012, Ensembles of neural networks based on the alteration of input feature values, International Journal of Neural Systems, 22, 77, 10.1142/S0129065712003079 · DOI
  6. Baraldi, 2011, Genetic algorithm-based wrapper approach for grouping condition monitoring signals of nuclear power plant components, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 18, 221, 10.3233/ICA-2011-0375 · DOI
  7. Chabuk, 2012, Casually-guided evolutionary optimization and its application to antenna array design, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 19, 111, 10.3233/ICA-2012-0395 · DOI
  8. Dargush, 2005, Evolutionary aseismic design and retrofit of structures with passive energy dissipation, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34, 1601, 10.1002/eqe.497 · DOI
  9. Fisco, 2011, Smart structures: part I–active and semi-active control, Scientia Iranica, 18, 275, 10.1016/j.scient.2011.05.034 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fisco, 2011, Smart structures: part II–hybrid control systems and control strategies, Scientia Iranica, 18, 285, 10.1016/j.scient.2011.05.035 · DOI
  11. Freitag, 2011, Recurrent neural networks for fuzzy data, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 18, 265, 10.3233/ICA-2011-0373 · DOI
  12. Fuggini, 2013, Combining genetic algorithms with a meso-scale approach for system identification of a smart polymeric textile, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28, 227, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00789.x · DOI
  13. Fujita, 2010, Optimal placement of viscoelastic dampers and supporting members under variable critical excitations, Earthquakes and Structures, 1, 43, 10.12989/eas.2010.1.1.043 · DOI
  14. Hejazi, 2009, Optimization of active variable stiffness system for controlling structural response of a building under earthquake excitation, Journal of Structural Engineering, 36, 235
  15. Hemami, 2012, Simulation of control and synthesis of a constrained movement towards rehabilitation exercises, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 19, 351, 10.3233/ICA-2012-0411 · DOI
  16. Hsu, 2012, Application of competitive Hopfield neural network clustering to brain-computer interface systems, International Journal of Neural Systems, 22, 51, 10.1142/S0129065712002979 · DOI
  17. Huang, 2011, Nonlinear torque and air-to-fuel ratio control of spark ignition engines using neuro-sliding mode technique, International Journal of Neural Systems, 21, 213, 10.1142/S012906571100278X · DOI
  18. Jiang, 2008, Dynamic fuzzy wavelet neuroemulator for non-linear control of irregular building structures, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 74, 1045, 10.1002/nme.2195 · DOI
  19. Jiang, 2008, Neuro-genetic algorithm for non-linear active control of structures, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 75, 770, 10.1002/nme.2274 · DOI
  20. Kim, 2001, Discrete cost optimization of composite floors using a floating-point genetic algorithm, Engineering Optimization, 33, 485, 10.1080/03052150108940930 · DOI
  21. Kim, 2004, Hybrid feedback-least mean square algorithm for structural control, Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 120, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(120) · DOI
  22. Kim, 2005, Hybrid control of smart structures using a novel wavelet-based algorithm, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20, 7, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00373.x · DOI
  23. Kim, 2005, Hybrid control of irregular steel high-rise building structures under seismic excitations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 63, 1757, 10.1002/nme.1336 · DOI
  24. Kim, 2005, Wavelet-hybrid feedback linear mean squared algorithm for robust control of cable-stayed bridges, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10, 116, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:2(116) · DOI
  25. Kim, 2005, Wind induced motion control of 76-story benchmark building using the hybrid damper-TLCD system, Journal of Structural Engineering, 131, 1794, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1794) · DOI
  26. Ko, 2012, Intelligent supervisory control system for home device using a cyber physical approach, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 19, 67, 10.3233/ICA-2012-0388 · DOI
  27. Lee, 2011, An adaptive fuzzy-based system to simulate, quantify, and compensate color blindness, Journal of Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 18, 29, 10.3233/ICA-2011-0356 · DOI
  28. Lin, 2012, Adaptive control for MIMO uncertain nonlinear systems using recurrent wavelet neural network, International Journal of Neural Systems, 22, 37, 10.1142/S0129065712002992 · DOI
  29. Liu, 2012, A novel efficient learning algorithm for self-generating fuzzy neural network with applications, International Journal of Neural Systems, 22, 21, 10.1142/S0129065712003067 · DOI
  30. Lopes, 2011, An evaluation of multiple feed-forward networks on graphics processing units, International Journal of Neural Systems, 21, 31, 10.1142/S0129065711002638 · DOI
  31. Ma, 2011, Extracting knowledge from fuzzy relational databases with description logic, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 18, 181, 10.3233/ICA-2011-0366 · DOI
  32. Mishra, 2004, Optimum design of cross flow plate-fin heat exchangers through genetic algorithm, International Journal of Heat Exchangers, 5, 379
  33. Movaffaghi, 2006, Optimal placement of dampers in structures using genetic algorithm, Engineering Computations, 23, 597, 10.1108/02644400610680324 · DOI
  34. Park, 2006, Distributed hybrid genetic algorithms for structural optimization on a PC cluster, Journal of Structural Engineering, 132, 1890, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(1890) · DOI
  35. Park, 2004, Preference-based optimum design of an integrated structural control system using genetic algorithms, Advances in Engineering Software, 35, 85, 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2003.10.004 · DOI
  36. Puscasu, 2011, Nonlinear system identification and control based on modular neural networks, International Journal of Neural Systems, 21, 319, 10.1142/S0129065711002869 · DOI
  37. Reuter, 2011, A fuzzy approach for modeling non-stochastic heterogeneous data in engineering based on cluster analysis, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 18, 281, 10.3233/ICA-2011-0371 · DOI
  38. Rodriguez, 2012, Teleoperation of multi-agent systems with non-uniform control input delays, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 19, 125, 10.3233/ICA-2012-0396 · DOI
  39. Saleh, 1994, Parallel algorithms for integrated structural/control optimization, Aerospace Engineering, 7, 297, 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1994)7:3(297) · DOI
  40. Saleh, 1996, Parallel eigenvalue for large-scale control optimization problems, Aerospace Engineering, 9, 70, 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1996)9:3(70) · DOI
  41. Saleh, 1997, Robust parallel algorithms for solution of Riccati equation, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 10, 126, 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1997)10:3(126) · DOI
  42. Saleh, 1998, Optimal control of adaptive/smart multistory building structures, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 13, 389, 10.1111/0885-9507.00117 · DOI
  43. Saleh, 1998, Optimal control of adaptive building structures under blast loading, Mechatronics, 8, 821, 10.1016/S0957-4158(98)00025-7 · DOI
  44. Sarma, 2001, Bi-level parallel genetic algorithms for optimization of large steel structures, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 16, 295, 10.1111/0885-9507.00234 · DOI
  45. Silvestri, 2007, Physical and numerical approaches for the optimal insertion of seismic viscous dampers in shear-type structures, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 11, 787, 10.1080/13632460601034155 · DOI
  46. Simpson, 1998, Comparison of response surface and kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 98, 1
  47. Singh, 2002, Optimal placement of dampers for passive response control, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 955, 10.1002/eqe.132 · DOI
  48. Soh, 1998, Optimal layout of bridge trusses by genetic algorithms, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 13, 247, 10.1111/0885-9507.00103 · DOI
  49. Theodoridis, 2012, Dynamical recurrent neuro-fuzzy identification schemes employing switching parameter hoping, International Journal of Neural Systems, 22, 1, 10.1142/S0129065712500049 · DOI
  50. Wongprasert, 2004, Application of a genetic algorithm for optimal damper distribution within the nonlinear seismic benchmark building, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130, 401, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(401) · DOI
  51. Yan, 2012, Comparison of entity with fuzzy data types in fuzzy object-oriented databases, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 19, 199, 10.3233/ICA-2012-0399 · DOI
  52. Yang, 1992, A seismic hybrid control of nonlinear and hysteretic structures-I, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 118, 1423, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:7(1423) · DOI
  53. Yeh, 1999, Hybrid genetic algorithms for optimization of truss structures, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 14, 199, 10.1111/0885-9507.00141 · DOI
  54. Yong, 2008, Optimal design of hysteretic dampers connecting adjacent structures using multi-objective genetic algorithm and stochastic linearization method, Engineering Structures, 30, 1240, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.019 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hejazi, F., Toloue, I., Jaafar, M. S., & Noorzaei, J.
Affiliations
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Hejazi, F.
ORCID
Venue
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
796-810
ISSN
1093-9687 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/mice.12047
OpenAlex
W2155039690
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
25.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Universiti Putra Malaysia (5524254, 9346800, 5524256)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Keywords
seismic energy dissipation, passive structural control, viscous dampers, multi-objective optimization, genetic algorithm, seismic response reduction, three-dimensional displacement, reinforced concrete frame buildings, structural safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review