The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic Pixel‐Level Crack Detection and Measurement Using Fully Convolutional Network
Open accessAbstract
The spatial characteristics of cracks are significant indicators to assess and evaluate the health of existing buildings and infrastructures. However, the current manual crack description method is time consuming and labor consuming. To improve the efficiency of crack inspection, advanced computer vision‐based techniques have been utilized to detect cracks automatically at image level and grid‐cell level. But existing crack detections are of (high specificity) low generality and inefficient, in terms that conventional approaches are unable to identify and measure diverse cracks concurrently at pixel level. Therefore, this research implements a novel deep learning technique named fully convolutional network (FCN) to address this problem. First, FCN is trained by feeding multiple types of cracks to semantically identify and segment pixel‐wise cracks at different scales. Then, the predicted crack segmentations are represented by single‐pixel width skeletons to quantitatively measure the morphological features of cracks, providing valuable crack indicators for assessment in practice, such as crack topology, crack length, max width, and mean width. To validate the prediction, the predicted segmentations are compared with recent advanced method for crack recognition and ground truth. For crack segmentation, the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are 97.96%, 81.73%, 78.97%, and 79.95%, respectively. For crack length, the relative measurement error varies from −48.03% to 177.79%, meanwhile that ranges from −13.27% to 24.01% for crack width. The results show that FCN is feasible and sufficient for crack identification and measurement. Although the accuracy is not as high as CrackNet because of three types of errors, the prediction has been increased to pixel level and the training time has been dramatically decreased to several per cents of previous methods due to the novel end‐to‐end structure of FCN, which combines typical convolutional neural networks and deconvolutional layers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
(2006) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-45528-0 · Cited by 9,824
Deep Learning‐Based Crack Damage Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Cha, Y., Choi, W., & Büyüköztürk, O. (2017) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12263 · Cited by 3,295
A fast parallel algorithm for thinning digital patterns
Zhang, T. Y., & Suen, C. Y. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/357994.358023 · Cited by 2,756
Building Skeleton Models via 3-D Medial Surface Axis Thinning Algorithms
Lee, T. C., Kashyap, R. L., & Chu, C. N. (1994) · CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing · doi:10.1006/cgip.1994.1042 · Cited by 1,545
Cited by
Deep Learning‐Based Crack Damage Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Cha, Y., Choi, W., & Büyüköztürk, O. (2017) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12263 · Cited by 3,295
Computer vision-based concrete crack detection using U-net fully convolutional networks
Liu, Z., Cao, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, W. (2019) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.005 · Cited by 833
Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A., & Pekcan, G. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102778 · Cited by 769
Machine Learning for Structural Engineering: A State-of-the-Art Review
Thai, H.-T. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 · Cited by 748
Machine Learning Algorithms in Civil Structural Health Monitoring: A Systematic Review
Flah, M., Nunez, I., Ben Chaabene, W., & Nehdi, M. L. (2021) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-020-09471-9 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, X., Li, H., Yu, Y., Luo, X., Huang, T., & Yang, X.
- Venue
- Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08-29
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1090-1109
- ISSN
- 1093-9687 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8667
- OpenAlex
- W2889494142
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 46.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic Pixel‐Level Crack Detection and Measurement Using Fully Convolutional Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mice.12412
- The paper
- Yang, X., Li, H., Yu, Y., Luo, X., Huang, T., & Yang, X. (2018). Automatic Pixel‐Level Crack Detection and Measurement Using Fully Convolutional Network. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.