A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies
Abstract
This study aimed to validate a newly‐developed instrument, The Writing Strategies for Self‐Regulated Learning (SRL) Questionnaire, with respect to its multifaceted structure of SRL strategies in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. A total of 790 undergraduate students from 6 universities in Northeast China volunteered to be participants. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) through structural equation modeling (SEM) were applied to evaluate 3 hypothesized models. The results of the CFA validated a 9‐factor correlated model of second language (L2) writing strategies for SRL with satisfactory psychometric characteristics. Model comparisons confirmed a hierarchical, multidimensional structure of SRL as the best model, in which self‐regulation, as a higher order construct, accounted for the correlations of the 9 lower‐order writing strategies, pertaining to cognitive, metacognitive, social–behavioral, and motivational regulation aspects. Multiple regression analysis revealed that 6 out of 9 SRL strategies had significant predictive effects on EFL writing proficiency. The empirical evidence lends preliminary support to a transfer of SRL theory from educational psychology to the field of L2/EFL education, particularly L2/EFL writing. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers' or students' skillful regulation of both positive and negative emotions in the language classroom contributes to effective teacher-student interpersonal relationships, students' learning gains, and teachers' successful teaching.
“Teachers or students' knowing how to skillfully regulate both positive and negative emotions in the language classroom contributes a lot to effective teacher-student interpersonal relationships, students' learning gains, and teachers' successful teaching (Ghanizadeh and Moafian, 2010; Teng and Zhang, 2016).”
From Researching and Practicing Positive Psychology in Second/Foreign Language Learning and Teaching: The Past, Current Status and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as Teng and Zhang, 2016
Cites
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · Cited by 8,332 · see citing works
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875 · see citing works
A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 · Cited by 3,807 · see citing works
A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students
Pintrich, P. R. (2004) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x · Cited by 3,269 · see citing works
Measuring Self-Regulated Learning
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50045-7 · Cited by 1,383 · see citing works
An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008) · doi:10.4324/9780203809532 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Self-citationTeng, M. F., Wang, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100573 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationTeng, L. S. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100645 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationYao, Y., Sun, Y., Zhu, S., & Zhu, X. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12824 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Understanding EFL student writers’ metacognitive awareness in utilizing ChatGPT
Teng, M. F. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103848 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Amani, N., & Bisriyah, M. (2025) · IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) · doi:10.21093/ijeltal.v10i1.1942 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- TENG, L. S., & ZHANG, L. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- TENG, LIN SOPHIE
- ZHANG, LAWRENCE JUN
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-18
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 674-701
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2394913823
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 84.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Keywords
- student self-regulation, writing strategies, EFL writing, second language writing, questionnaire validation, psychometric properties, metacognitive regulation, motivational regulation, cognitive regulation, writing skills, undergraduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review