Cited by 34Malaria Research and ControlInsect Resistance and GeneticsDengue and Mosquito Control Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria

Open access
OKORIE, P. N., ADEMOWO, O. G., IRVING, H., KELLY‐HOPE, L. A., WONDJI, C. S.·2015·Medical and Veterinary Entomology

Abstract

The emergence of insecticide resistance in A nopheles ( D iptera: C ulicidae) mosquitoes has great implications for malaria control in N igeria. This study aimed to determine the dynamics of insecticide susceptibility levels and the frequency of knock‐down resistance ( kdr ) mutations ( L1014F ) in wild A nopheles coluzzii C oetzee & W ilkerson sp. n. and A nopheles gambiae G iles from the O joo and B odija areas of I badan, in southwest N igeria. Insecticide susceptibility to pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates and organochlorines was assessed using World Health Organization ( WHO ) bioassays. A subset of the mosquitoes exposed to pyrethroids and DDT was used for species and molecular form identification; kdr genotyping was determined using the T aq M an real‐time polymerase chain reaction assay. The mosquitoes were resistant to pyrethroids and DDT but completely susceptible to organophosphates and carbamates. Bodija samples ( n = 186) consisted of A n. gambiae (91.4%) and A n. coluzzii (8.1%) and included one A n. coluzzii / A n. gambiae hybrid specimen. All mosquitoes screened in O joo ( n = 26) were A n. gambiae . The 1014F kdr mutation was detected at frequencies of 24.5 and 5.8% in B odija and O joo, respectively. No correlation was observed between kdr genotypes and resistance phenotypes. The results indicate that metabolic resistance probably plays an important role in the development of resistance and highlight the need to implement insecticide resistance management strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mve.12089

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These mutations have also been detected with high frequencies in An. gambiae (s.l.) in many regions of West Africa, with ecological similarities in Burkina Faso and Benin.

    “These mutations have also been detected with high frequencies in An. gambiae (s.l.) in many regions of West Africa [28, 29] with ecological similarities in Burkina Faso and Benin (cotton, rice and urban/sub-urban vegetable growing areas) [30, 31].”

    From Mapping insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) from Côte d'Ivoire (2018) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results (Kdr mutation; page unavailable) report L1014F in An. gambiae and An. coluzzii at two sites in Ibadan, Nigeria. The paper does not establish high mutation frequencies across many West African regions or the claimed ecological similarities involving cotton, rice, and vegetable-growing areas in Burkina Faso and Benin. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Awolola T.S., 2007, Dynamics of knockdown pyrethroid insecticide resistance alleles in a field population of Anopheles gambiae s.s. in southwestern Nigeria, Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, 44, 181
  2. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.06.002 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/1475-2875-6-159 · DOI
  4. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-538 · DOI
  5. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2002.00393.x · DOI
  6. Gillies M., 1987, A Supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara
  7. Gillies M., 1968, The Anophelinae of Africa, South of the Sahara (Ethiopian Zoogeographical Region)
  8. 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.371 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1089/vbz.2010.0192 · DOI
  10. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2003.00449.x · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.gene.2013.01.036 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/genetics/107.4.611 · DOI
  13. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1998.72062.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1203452109 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000286 · DOI
  16. National Malaria Control Programme, 2012, National Malaria Control Programme 2012 1st and 2nd Quarter Report
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031943 · DOI
  18. 10.1534/genetics.112.148718 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/1756-3305-6-41 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/1756-3305-5-116 · DOI
  21. Oduola A.O., 2010, High level of DDT resistance in the malaria mosquito: Anopheles gambiae s.l. from rural, semi‐urban and urban communities in Nigeria, Journal of Rural and Tropical Public Health, 9, 114
  22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028347 · DOI
  23. 10.1017/S0007485307005317 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.02.022 · DOI
  25. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00209.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1186/1475-2875-8-299 · DOI
  27. 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r27 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2004.00452.x · DOI
  29. World Health Organization, 1998, Test Procedures for Insecticide Resistance Monitoring in Malaria Vectors, Bio‐efficacy and Persistence of Insecticides on Treated Surfaces
  30. World Health Organization, 2013, Test Procedures for Insecticide Resistance Monitoring in Malaria Vector Mosquitoes
  31. Wondji C., 2005, Species and populations of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Cameroon with special emphasis on chromosomal and molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s, Journal of Medical Entomology, 42, 998, 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0998:SAPOTA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  32. 10.1534/genetics.106.065888 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
OKORIE, P. N., ADEMOWO, O. G., IRVING, H., KELLY‐HOPE, L. A., & WONDJI, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
OKORIE, P. N.
Venue
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-22
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
44-50
ISSN
  • 0269-283X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2915
OpenAlex
W1660474053
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical and Veterinary Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Education Partnership Initiative in Nigeria (R24TW008878)
  • Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellowship (083515/Z/07/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
Keywords
insecticide resistance, Anopheles coluzzii, Anopheles gambiae, malaria vectors, pyrethroid resistance, DDT resistance, knockdown resistance, kdr mutation, L1014F, metabolic resistance, organophosphates, carbamates, organochlorine compounds, Ibadan, insecticide resistance management
MeSH terms
Animals, Anopheles, Carbamates, Decision Making, Insecticide Resistance, Insecticides, Mosquito Control, Nigeria, Organophosphates, Insect Proteins, Mutation Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review