Cited by 39Advanced Glycation End Products researchChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDialysis and Renal Disease Management

Methylglyoxal as a prognostic factor in patients with chronic kidney disease

Tezuka, Yuta, Nakaya, Izaya, Nakayama, Keisuke, Nakayama, Masaaki, Yahata, Mayumi, Soma, Jun·2019·Nephrology

Abstract

Aim Advanced glycation end products and their precursors cause vascular damage through oxidative stress. We investigated the hypothesis that methylglyoxal (MG), 3-deoxyglucosone (3-DG) and pentosidine influence outcomes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Methods We conducted a 3 years prospective observational study involving 150 outpatients at CKD stages 3-5. At enrolment, MG, 3-DG and pentosidine plasma concentrations were measured; patients were divided into tertiles according to the concentration of each substance. The primary endpoint was death, a cardiovascular event or end-stage renal disease. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression model. Results The patients' mean age was 62 ± 12 years, 97 were men, and 20 had diabetic nephropathy. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 25.0 ± 12.1 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 , which negatively correlated with MG but not with 3-DG and pentosidine. Forty-eight patients reached the primary endpoint. Compared with the lowest MG tertile, the hazard ratio for the primary endpoint was 7.57 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.71-33.54) in the middle tertile and 27.00 (CI: 6.46-112.82) in the highest tertile. When adjusted for characteristics at baseline, the corresponding hazard ratio decreased to 2.09 (CI: 0.37-11.96) and 6.13 (CI: 0.97-38.82), but MG tertile remained an independent risk factor for the primary endpoint. However, 3-DG and pentosidine were not related to the primary outcome. Conclusion Methylglyoxal h…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nep.13526

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tezuka, Y., Nakaya, I., Nakayama, K., Nakayama, M., Yahata, M., & Soma, J.
Affiliations
  • Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital (JP)
  • Tohoku University Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakaya, Izaya
Venue
Nephrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-29
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
943-950
ISSN
  • 1320-5358 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1797
OpenAlex
W2899819196
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chugai Pharmaceutical
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
methylglyoxal, chronic kidney disease, 3-deoxyglucosone, pentosidine, advanced glycation end products, prognostic factors, end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular events, mortality, oxidative stress, renal function decline
MeSH terms
Aged, Arginine, Cardiovascular Diseases, Deoxyglucose, Diabetic Nephropathies, Female, Humans, Japan, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Lysine, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Pyruvaldehyde, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Up-Regulation, Disease Progression, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review