Cited by 19Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersCeliac Disease Research and Management

Neurological autoimmune disorders with prominent gastrointestinal manifestations: a review of presentation, evaluation, and treatment

Blackburn, Kyle M., Kubiliun, Maddie, Harris, Samar, Vernino, Steven·2019·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background The identification of autoantibodies directed against neuronal antigens has led to the recognition of a wide spectrum of neurological autoimmune disorders (NAD). With timely recognition and treatment, many patients with NAD see rapid improvement. Symptoms associated with NAD can be diverse and are determined by the regions of the nervous system affected. In addition to neurological symptoms, a number of these disorders present with prominent gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations such as nausea, diarrhea, weight loss, and gastroparesis prompting an initial evaluation by gastroenterologists. Purpose This review provides a general overview of autoantibodies within the nervous system, focusing on three scenarios in which nervous system autoimmunity may initially present with gut symptoms. A general approach to evaluation and treatment, including antibody testing, will be reviewed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.13611

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other antibodies, including ganglionic acetylcholine receptor antibodies and CRMP-5 (CV2), have also been associated with enteric dysmotility in paraneoplastic or autoimmune contexts.

    “Other antibodies, including ganglionic acetylcholine receptor antibodies and CRMP-5 (CV2), have also been associated with enteric dysmotility in paraneoplastic/autoimmune contexts (Blackburn et al., 2019; Vernino et al., 2000), and neuropathologic studies show that some patients have more extensive involvement (Sodhi et al., 1989).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 40 · Cited by 19

Authors
Blackburn, K. M., Kubiliun, M., Harris, S., & Vernino, S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Blackburn, Kyle M.
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-23
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
e13611-e13611
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
OpenAlex
W2941493018
Cited by
19
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
Keywords
gastrointestinal manifestations, autoantibodies, neuronal antigens, gastroparesis, diarrhea, weight loss, nausea, antibody detection, diagnosis, treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Neoplasm, Antibodies, Antinuclear, Autoantibodies, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Brain, Diarrhea, Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuromyelitis Optica, Potassium Channels, Weight Loss, Gastroparesis, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System, Paraneoplastic Syndromes, Nervous System, Area Postrema, Aquaporin 4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review