Cited by 203Plant Diversity and EvolutionEvolution and Genetic DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Reinforcement in plants

Open access
Hopkins, Robin·2013·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: A major goal of evolutionary biology is to understand how diverging populations become species. The evolution of reproductive isolation (RI) halts the genomic homogenization caused by gene flow and recombination, and enables differentiation and local adaptations to become fixed between newly forming species. Selection can favor the strengthening of RI through a process termed reinforcement. Reinforcement occurs when selection favors traits that decrease mating between two incipient species in response to costly mating or the production of maladapted hybrids. Although this process has been investigated more frequently in animals, there is also evidence of reinforcement in plants. There are three strategies for the investigation of the process of reinforcement: case studies of species or diverging taxa; experimental evolution studies; and comparative studies. Here,I discuss how all three strategies find evidence consistent with reinforcement occurring in plants.I focus largely on case studies, and use research onP hlox drummondii to illustrate the importance of testing alternative hypotheses. Although the existing evidence suggests that reinforcement can occur, further investigations, particularly using large‐scale comparative studies, are needed to determine the importance of reinforcement in plant speciation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.12119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selection against hybrids can strengthen RI through reinforcement.

    “On the other hand, selection against hybrids can strengthen RI through reinforcement (Hopkins, 2013; Figure 3).”

    From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Hopkins, 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hopkins, R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Hopkins, Robin
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-16
Volume
197
Issue
4
Pages
1095-1103
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2128849856
Cited by
203
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
reinforcement, reproductive isolation, plant speciation, hybrid inviability, hybrid sterility, mating systems, Phlox drummondii, gene flow, local adaptation, experimental evolution, comparative analysis
MeSH terms
Hybridization, Genetic, Plants, Reproduction, Selection, Genetic, Texas, Genetic Speciation, Gene Flow, Reproductive Isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review