Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rhizosphere stoichiometry: are C : N : P ratios of plants, soils, and enzymes conserved at the plant species‐level?

Bell, Colin, Carrillo, Yolima, Boot, Claudia M., Rocca, Jennifer D., Pendall, Elise, Wallenstein, Matthew D.·2014·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: As a consequence of the tight linkages among soils, plants and microbes inhabiting the rhizosphere, we hypothesized that soil nutrient and microbial stoichiometry would differ among plant species and be correlated within plant rhizospheres. We assessed plant tissue carbon (C) : nitrogen (N) : phosphorus (P) ratios for eight species representing four different plant functional groups in a semiarid grassland during near‐peak biomass. Using intact plant species‐specific rhizospheres, we examined soil C : N : P, microbial biomass C : N, and soil enzyme C : N : P nutrient acquisition activities. We found that few of the plant species' rhizospheres demonstrated distinct stoichiometric properties from other plant species and unvegetated soil. Plant tissue nutrient ratios and components of below‐ground rhizosphere stoichiometry predominantly differed between the C 4 plant species Buchloe dactyloides and the legume Astragalus laxmannii. The rhizospheres under the C 4 grass B. dactyloides exhibited relatively higher microbial C and lower soil N, indicative of distinct soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition and nutrient mineralization activities. Assessing the ecological stoichiometry among plant species' rhizospheres is a high‐resolution tool useful for linking plant community composition to below‐ground soil microbial and nutrient characteristics. By identifying how rhizospheres differ among plant species, we can better assess how plant–microbial interactions associated with ecosystem‐level processes may be influenced by plant community shifts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.12531

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Bell, C., Carrillo, Y., Boot, C. M., Rocca, J. D., Pendall, E., & Wallenstein, M. D.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-04
Volume
201
Issue
2
Pages
505-517
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2163715168
Cited by
257
References
95
FWCI
13.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhizosphere stoichiometry: are C : N : P ratios of plants, soils, and enzymes conserved at the plant species‐level? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12531
The paper
Bell, C., Carrillo, Y., Boot, C. M., Rocca, J. D., Pendall, E., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2014). Rhizosphere stoichiometry: are C : N : P ratios of plants, soils, and enzymes conserved at the plant species‐level? New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12531

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.