The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rhizosphere stoichiometry: are C : N : P ratios of plants, soils, and enzymes conserved at the plant species‐level?
Abstract
Summary: As a consequence of the tight linkages among soils, plants and microbes inhabiting the rhizosphere, we hypothesized that soil nutrient and microbial stoichiometry would differ among plant species and be correlated within plant rhizospheres. We assessed plant tissue carbon (C) : nitrogen (N) : phosphorus (P) ratios for eight species representing four different plant functional groups in a semiarid grassland during near‐peak biomass. Using intact plant species‐specific rhizospheres, we examined soil C : N : P, microbial biomass C : N, and soil enzyme C : N : P nutrient acquisition activities. We found that few of the plant species' rhizospheres demonstrated distinct stoichiometric properties from other plant species and unvegetated soil. Plant tissue nutrient ratios and components of below‐ground rhizosphere stoichiometry predominantly differed between the C 4 plant species Buchloe dactyloides and the legume Astragalus laxmannii. The rhizospheres under the C 4 grass B. dactyloides exhibited relatively higher microbial C and lower soil N, indicative of distinct soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition and nutrient mineralization activities. Assessing the ecological stoichiometry among plant species' rhizospheres is a high‐resolution tool useful for linking plant community composition to below‐ground soil microbial and nutrient characteristics. By identifying how rhizospheres differ among plant species, we can better assess how plant–microbial interactions associated with ecosystem‐level processes may be influenced by plant community shifts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Modern Applied Statistics with S
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 · Cited by 24,305
vegan: Community Ecology Package
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., et al. (2001) · CRAN: Contributed Packages · doi:10.32614/cran.package.vegan · Cited by 22,615
An Analysis of Transformations
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · Cited by 15,052
Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties.
Page, A. L. (1982) · Cited by 12,923
An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C
Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1987) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6 · Cited by 12,887
Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods.
Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., Loeppert, R. H., Soltanpour, P. N., Tabatabai, M. A., Johnston, C. T., & Sumner, M. E. (1996) · Cited by 8,502
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D. A. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10386 · Cited by 6,057
Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere
Sterner, R. W., & Elser, J. J. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,476
Olsen, S. R., & Sommers, L. E. (1982) · Agronomy Monographs · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c24 · Cited by 3,042
Cited by
Cui, Y., Fang, L., Guo, X., Han, F., Ju, W., Ye, L., Wang, X., Tan, W., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.173 · Cited by 282
Enhanced yields and soil quality in a wheat-maize rotation using buried straw mulch
Guo, Z., Liu, H., Wan, S., Hua, K., Jiang, C., Wang, D., He, C., & Guo, X. (2017) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8183 · Cited by 26
Ferrarini, A., Martani, E., Fornasier, F., & Amaducci, S. (2021) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.107247 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, C., Carrillo, Y., Boot, C. M., Rocca, J. D., Pendall, E., & Wallenstein, M. D.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10-04
- Volume
- 201
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 505-517
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2163715168
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhizosphere stoichiometry: are C : N : P ratios of plants, soils, and enzymes conserved at the plant species‐level? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12531
- The paper
- Bell, C., Carrillo, Y., Boot, C. M., Rocca, J. D., Pendall, E., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2014). Rhizosphere stoichiometry: are C : N : P ratios of plants, soils, and enzymes conserved at the plant species‐level? New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12531
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.