Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 553

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experiences from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: ecological findings and conservation initiatives

Open access
Joly, Carlos A., Metzger, Jean Paul, Tabarelli, Marcelo·2014·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: The Brazilian Atlantic Forest hosts one of the world's most diverse and threatened tropical forest biota. In many ways, its history of degradation describes the fate experienced by tropical forests around the world. After five centuries of human expansion, most Atlantic Forest landscapes are archipelagos of small forest fragments surrounded by open‐habitat matrices. This ‘natural laboratory’ has contributed to a better understanding of the evolutionary history and ecology of tropical forests and to determining the extent to which this irreplaceable biota is susceptible to major human disturbances. We share some of the major findings with respect to the responses of tropical forests to human disturbances across multiple biological levels and spatial scales and discuss some of the conservation initiatives adopted in the past decade. First, we provide a short description of the Atlantic Forest biota and its historical degradation. Secondly, we offer conceptual models describing major shifts experienced by tree assemblages at local scales and discuss landscape ecological processes that can help to maintain this biota at larger scales. We also examine potential plant responses to climate change. Finally, we propose a research agenda to improve the conservation value of human‐modified landscapes and safeguard the biological heritage of tropical forests. Contents Summary 459 I. Introduction 459 II. The Atlantic Forest: a highly diverse, relevant and threatened forest 460 III. Biotic homogenization and forest secondarization 462 IV. Species persistence at larger scales 464 V. Future threats: climate change impacts 466 VI. Atlantic Forest conservation: integrating basic and applied research agendas 467 VII. Concluding remarks 469 Acknowledgements 469 References 469

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.12989

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 127 references

Cited by

See all 553

Metadata

Authors
Joly, C. A., Metzger, J. P., & Tabarelli, M.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-10
Volume
204
Issue
3
Pages
459-473
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2128032932
Cited by
553
References
127
FWCI
19.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experiences from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: ecological findings and conservation initiatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12989
The paper
Joly, C. A., Metzger, J. P., & Tabarelli, M. (2014). Experiences from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: ecological findings and conservation initiatives. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12989

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.