Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 647

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon sequestration is related to mycorrhizal fungal community shifts during long‐term succession in boreal forests

Clemmensen, Karina E., Finlay, Roger D., Dahlberg, Anders, Stenlid, Jan, Wardle, David A., Lindahl, Björn D.·2015·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Boreal forest soils store a major proportion of the global terrestrial carbon (C) and below‐ground inputs contribute as much as above‐ground plant litter to the total C stored in the soil. A better understanding of the dynamics and drivers of root‐associated fungal communities is essential to predict long‐term soil C storage and climate feedbacks in northern ecosystems. We used 454‐pyrosequencing to identify fungal communities across fine‐scaled soil profiles in a 5000 yr fire‐driven boreal forest chronosequence, with the aim of pinpointing shifts in fungal community composition that may underlie variation in below‐ground C sequestration. In early successional‐stage forests, higher abundance of cord‐forming ectomycorrhizal fungi (such as Cortinarius and Suillus species) was linked to rapid turnover of mycelial biomass and necromass, efficient nitrogen (N) mobilization and low C sequestration. In late successional‐stage forests, cord formers declined, while ericoid mycorrhizal ascomycetes continued to dominate, potentially facilitating long‐term humus build‐up through production of melanized hyphae that resist decomposition. Our results suggest that cord‐forming ectomycorrhizal fungi and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi play opposing roles in below‐ground C storage. We postulate that, by affecting turnover and decomposition of fungal tissues, mycorrhizal fungal identity and growth form are critical determinants of C and N sequestration in boreal forests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.13208

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 647

Metadata

Authors
Clemmensen, K. E., Finlay, R. D., Dahlberg, A., Stenlid, J., Wardle, D. A., & Lindahl, B. D.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-11
Volume
205
Issue
4
Pages
1525-1536
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W1974972343
Cited by
647
References
2
FWCI
41.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon sequestration is related to mycorrhizal fungal community shifts during long‐term succession in boreal forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13208
The paper
Clemmensen, K. E., Finlay, R. D., Dahlberg, A., Stenlid, J., Wardle, D. A., & Lindahl, B. D. (2015). Carbon sequestration is related to mycorrhizal fungal community shifts during long‐term succession in boreal forests. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13208

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.