Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distribution and mixing of old and new nonstructural carbon in two temperate trees

Open access
Richardson, Andrew D., Carbone, Mariah S., Huggett, Brett A., Furze, Morgan E., Czimczik, Claudia I., Walker, Jennifer C., Xu, Xiaomei, Schaberg, Paul G., Murakami, Paula·2015·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: We know surprisingly little about whole‐tree nonstructural carbon (NSC; primarily sugars and starch) budgets. Even less well understood is the mixing between recent photosynthetic assimilates (new NSC) and previously stored reserves. And, NSC turnover times are poorly constrained. We characterized the distribution of NSC in the stemwood, branches, and roots of two temperate trees, and we used the continuous label offered by the radiocarbon (carbon‐14, 14 C) bomb spike to estimate the mean age of NSC in different tissues. NSC in branches and the outermost stemwood growth rings had the 14 C signature of the current growing season. However, NSC in older aboveground and belowground tissues was enriched in 14 C, indicating that it was produced from older assimilates. Radial patterns of 14 C in stemwood NSC showed strong mixing of NSC across the youngest growth rings, with limited ‘mixing in’ of younger NSC to older rings. Sugars in the outermost five growth rings, accounting for two‐thirds of the stemwood pool, had a mean age < 1 yr, whereas sugars in older growth rings had a mean age > 5 yr. Our results are thus consistent with a previously‐hypothesized two‐pool (‘fast’ and ‘slow’ cycling NSC) model structure. These pools appear to be physically distinct.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.13273

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Richardson, A. D., Carbone, M. S., Huggett, B. A., Furze, M. E., Czimczik, C. I., Walker, J. C., Xu, X., Schaberg, P. G., & Murakami, P.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-05
Volume
206
Issue
2
Pages
590-597
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2127785045
Cited by
161
References
1
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution and mixing of old and new nonstructural carbon in two temperate trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13273
The paper
Richardson, A. D., Carbone, M. S., Huggett, B. A., Furze, M. E., Czimczik, C. I., Walker, J. C., Xu, X., Schaberg, P. G., & Murakami, P. (2015). Distribution and mixing of old and new nonstructural carbon in two temperate trees. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.