‘One physical system’: Tansley's ecosystem as Earth's critical zone
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Integrative concepts of the biosphere, ecosystem, biogeocenosis and, recently, Earth's critical zone embrace scientific disciplines that link matter, energy and organisms in a systems‐level understanding of our remarkable planet. Here, we assert the congruence of Tansley's (1935) venerable ecosystem concept of ‘one physical system’ with Earth science's critical zone. Ecosystems and critical zones are congruent across spatial–temporal scales from vegetation‐clad weathering profiles and hillslopes, small catchments, landscapes, river basins, continents, to Earth's whole terrestrial surface. What may be less obvious is congruence in the vertical dimension. We use ecosystem metabolism to argue that full accounting of photosynthetically fixed carbon includes respiratory CO 2 and carbonic acid that propagate to the base of the critical zone itself. Although a small fraction of respiration, the downward diffusion of CO 2 helps determine rates of soil formation and, ultimately, ecosystem evolution and resilience. Because life in the upper portions of terrestrial ecosystems significantly affects biogeochemistry throughout weathering profiles, the lower boundaries of most terrestrial ecosystems have been demarcated at depths too shallow to permit a complete understanding of ecosystem structure and function. Opportunities abound to explore connections between upper and lower components of critical‐zone ecosystems, between soils and streams in watersheds, and between plant‐derived CO 2 and deep microbial communities and mineral weathering. Contents Summary 900 I. Introduction 900 II. Tansley's ecosystem as ‘one physical system’ 901 III. Earth's critical zone 901 IV. Historic developments in ecosystem science 902 V. The metabolism of ecosystems and critical zones 905 VI. Towards a more active biogeoscience 908 Acknowledgements 909 References 909
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
90% of studies focus only on the upper 30 cm of the soil profile.
“Moreover, 90% of studies focus only on the upper 30 cm of the soil profile (Richter & Billings, 2015), thus the influences of fire on soil processes throughout the profile remain poorly characterized.”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Richter & Billings, 2015
Cites
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602 · see citing works
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 2× · see citing works
“2 Histogram of maximum depth of soil sampling in > 360 research studies that estimated changes in soil organic carbon in response to land use change (Post & Kwon, 2000; West & Post, 2002).”
BackgroundWhen did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal
Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Williams, M., Barnosky, A. D., Cearreta, A., Crutzen, P., Ellis, E., Ellis, M. A., Fairchild, I. J., Grinevald, J., et al. (2015) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045 · Cited by 784 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…when a Working Group of the International Commission on Stratigraphy is evaluating ‘the Anthropocene’ as a new, contemporary unit of geological time (Zalasiewicz et al., 2011, 2015; Haff, 2014; Waters et al., 2014; Edgeworth et al., 2015), how better to promote an understanding of the human…”
BackgroundSelf-citationDrewry, D. T., Kumar, P., & Long, S. P. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12567 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“Moreover, 90% of studies focus only on the upper 30 cm of the soil profile (Richter & Billings, 2015), thus the influences of fire on soil processes throughout the profile remain poorly characterized.”
- Authors
- Richter, D. D., & Billings, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Richter, Daniel deB.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03-02
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 900-912
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2125690256
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1331846)
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Directorate for Geosciences
- Division of Earth Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Keywords
- ecosystem metabolism, ecosystem respiration, carbonic acid, soil formation, weathering profiles, biogeosciences, terrestrial ecosystems, photosynthetic carbon fixation
- MeSH terms
- Carbon Dioxide, Soil, Ecosystem, Earth, Planet, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Earth Sciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review