The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common foliar fungi of Populus trichocarpa modify Melampsora rust disease severity
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Nonpathogenic foliar fungi (i.e. endophytes and epiphytes) can modify plant disease severity in controlled experiments. However, experiments have not been combined with ecological studies in wild plant pathosystems to determine whether disease‐modifying fungi are common enough to be ecologically important. We used culture‐based methods and DNA sequencing to characterize the abundance and distribution of foliar fungi of Populus trichocarpa in wild populations across its native range (Pacific Northwest, USA). We conducted complementary, manipulative experiments to test how foliar fungi commonly isolated from those populations influence the severity of Melampsora leaf rust disease. Finally, we examined correlative relationships between the abundance of disease‐modifying foliar fungi and disease severity in wild trees. A taxonomically and geographically diverse group of common foliar fungi significantly modified disease severity in experiments, either increasing or decreasing disease severity. Spatial patterns in the abundance of some of these foliar fungi were significantly correlated (in predicted directions) with disease severity in wild trees. Our study reveals that disease modification is an ecological function shared by common foliar fungal symbionts of P. trichocarpa. This finding raises new questions about plant disease ecology and plant biodiversity, and has applied potential for disease management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
Martin, M. (2011) · EMBnet.journal · doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · Cited by 33,889
A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x · Cited by 10,356
Global Optimization of Statistical Functions with Simulated Annealing
Goffe, W. L., Ferrier, G. D., & Rogers, J. (1994) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)90038-8 · Cited by 1,610
Cited by
Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant
Wagner, M. R., Lundberg, D. S., del Rio, T. G., Tringe, S. G., Dangl, J. L., & Mitchell-Olds, T. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12151 · Cited by 990
Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome
Peay, K. G., Kennedy, P. G., & Talbot, J. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59 · Cited by 721
Self-citationInterplay Between Innate Immunity and the Plant Microbiota
Hacquard, S., Spaepen, S., Garrido-Oter, R., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2017) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035623 · Cited by 513
Fungal endophytes: modifiers of plant disease
Busby, P. E., Ridout, M., & Newcombe, G. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0412-0 · Cited by 445
Self-citationThe Populus holobiont: dissecting the effects of plant niches and genotype on the microbiome
Cregger, M. A., Veach, A. M., Yang, Z. K., Crouch, M. J., Vilgalys, R., Tuskan, G. A., & Schadt, C. W. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0413-8 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Busby, P. E., Peay, K. G., & Newcombe, G.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11-13
- Volume
- 209
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1681-1692
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2191515658
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common foliar fungi of Populus trichocarpa modify Melampsora rust disease severity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13742
- The paper
- Busby, P. E., Peay, K. G., & Newcombe, G. (2016). Common foliar fungi of Populus trichocarpa modify Melampsora rust disease severity. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.