Cited by 566Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism

Root structure–function relationships in 74 species: evidence of a root economics spectrum related to carbon economy

Roumet, Catherine, Birouste, Marine, Picon‐Cochard, Catherine, Ghestem, Murielle, Osman, Normaniza, Vrignon‐Brenas, Sylvain, Cao, Kun‐fang, Stokes, Alexia·2016·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Although fine roots are important components of the global carbon cycle, there is limited understanding of root structure–function relationships among species. We determined whether root respiration rate and decomposability, two key processes driving carbon cycling but always studied separately, varied with root morphological and chemical traits, in a coordinated way that would demonstrate the existence of a root economics spectrum ( RES ). Twelve traits were measured on fine roots (diameter ≤ 2 mm) of 74 species (31 graminoids and 43 herbaceous and dwarf shrub eudicots) collected in three biomes. The findings of this study support the existence of a RES representing an axis of trait variation in which root respiration was positively correlated to nitrogen concentration and specific root length and negatively correlated to the root dry matter content, lignin : nitrogen ratio and the remaining mass after decomposition. This pattern of traits was highly consistent within graminoids but less consistent within eudicots, as a result of an uncoupling between decomposability and morphology, and of heterogeneity of individual roots of eudicots within the fine‐root pool. The positive relationship found between root respiration and decomposability is essential for a better understanding of vegetation–soil feedbacks and for improving terrestrial biosphere models predicting the consequences of plant community changes for carbon cycling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.13828

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roumet, C., Birouste, M., Picon‐Cochard, C., Ghestem, M., Osman, N., Vrignon‐Brenas, S., Cao, K., & Stokes, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Unité Mixte de Recherche sur l'Ecosystème Prairial (FR)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • University of Malaya (MY)
  • Guangxi University (CN)
Corresponding author
Picon‐Cochard, Catherine
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-14
Volume
210
Issue
3
Pages
815-826
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2301529081
Cited by
566
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 14
FWCI
44.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversite (AAP‐IN‐2009‐046, AAP-IN-2009-046)
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie
  • Centre International d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Keywords
root economics spectrum, fine roots, root respiration, root morphology, nitrogen content, specific root length, root dry matter content, graminoids, eudicots, plant-soil feedback, terrestrial carbon cycle, plant functional traits
MeSH terms
Carbon, Species Specificity, Linear Models, Plant Roots, Cell Respiration, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review