Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phosphate‐solubilising microorganisms for improved crop productivity: a critical assessment

Raymond, Nelly S., Gómez‐Muñoz, Beatriz, van der Bom, Frederik J. T., Nybroe, Ole, Jensen, Lars S., Müller‐Stöver, Dorette S., Oberson, Astrid, Richardson, Alan E.·2021·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Phosphate‐solubilising microorganisms (PSM) are often reported to have positive effects on crop productivity through enhanced phosphorus (P) nutrition. Our aim was to evaluate the validity of this concept. Most studies that report ‘positive effects’ of PSM on plant growth have been conducted under controlled conditions, whereas field experiments more frequently fail to demonstrate a positive response. Many studies have indicated that the mechanisms seen in vitro do not translate into improved crop P nutrition in complex soil–plant systems. Furthermore, associated mechanisms are often not rigorously assessed. We suggest that PSM do not mobilise sufficient P to change the crops’ nutritional environment under field conditions. The current concept, in which PSM solubilise P ‘for the plant’ should thus be revised. Although PSM have the capacity to solubilise P to meet their own needs, it is the turnover of the microbial biomass that subsequently provides P to plants over a longer time. Therefore, the existing concept of PSM function is unlikely to deliver a reliable strategy for increasing crop P nutrition. A further mechanistic understanding is needed to determine how P mobilisation by PSM as a component of the whole soil community can be manipulated to become more effective for plant P nutrition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.16924

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Raymond, N. S., Gómez‐Muñoz, B., van der Bom, F. J. T., Nybroe, O., Jensen, L. S., Müller‐Stöver, D. S., Oberson, A., & Richardson, A. E.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-09
Volume
229
Issue
3
Pages
1268-1277
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W3085219747
Cited by
246
References
1
FWCI
14.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphate‐solubilising microorganisms for improved crop productivity: a critical assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.16924
The paper
Raymond, N. S., Gómez‐Muñoz, B., van der Bom, F. J. T., Nybroe, O., Jensen, L. S., Müller‐Stöver, D. S., Oberson, A., & Richardson, A. E. (2021). Phosphate‐solubilising microorganisms for improved crop productivity: a critical assessment. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16924

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.