The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A band aid on a gaping wound: Taylor and modern working practices: Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices, reviewed by Phil Taylor
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Accordingly, the generalised legacy in terms of tightened managerial control, cost cutting, intensification of work, Taylorist continuities, metrics and target obsession (Taylor 2019) is an inherited workplace eco-system, in which subsequent, 'new, new technologies' (Holtgrewe 2014) have been and are being implemented.”
From Reflections on Sociotechnical Change: New Directions for and Continuities in Research on New Technology, Work, and Employment (2026) · cites this paper as Taylor 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1093/indlaw/dwx028 · DOI
- Bloodworth J., 2018, Hired: Six Months Undercover in Low‐Wage Britain
- 10.1111/irj.12232 · DOI · Paper page
- Callinicos A., 2001, Against the Third Way
- 10.1177/0950017012469064 · DOI
- CIPD, 2018, Health and Well‐being at Work
- 10.1177/0261018317726622 · DOI
- 10.1177/0950017015624399 · DOI
- Green F., 2006, Demanding Work: The Paradox of Job Quality in the Affluent Economy
- 10.1177/001979391306600402 · DOI
- Main J.(2018) Scared to go Sick: Trade Union Members’ Responses to Sickness Absence Policy Management Within Local Government PhD Thesis (Glasgow:University of Strathclyde).
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213375.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/irj.12229 · DOI
- 10.23943/9781400889433 · DOI
- 10.1111/irj.12239 · DOI
- 10.1332/policypress/9781847429117.001.0001 · DOI
- Taylor P., 2013, Performance Management and the New Workplace Tyranny
- 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2010.00569.x · DOI
Cited by
Howcroft, D., Lucio, M. M., & Taylor, P. (2026) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.70049 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Strathclyde
- Venue
- New Technology, Work and Employment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 100-105
- ISSN
- 0268-1072
- 1468-005X
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
