The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autonomy at work in the gig economy: analysing work status, work content and working conditions of independent professionals
Abstract
This paper offers a critical perspective on the debate surrounding autonomy at work for a specific category of non‐standard workers: independent professionals. The increasing numbers now working this way as well as their spread into all sectors, industries and occupations, mean that their work arrangements can no longer be dismissed as non‐standard or atypical. Defining them by what they are not is quite simply no longer an option. Our paper examines the various components intertwined behind the taken‐for‐granted concept of autonomy. Drawing on debates from the legal through to the sociological and HR literatures, we identify three underlying dimensions to autonomy. When combined, they provide the basis for an analytical matrix that may assist policy makers, practitioners and individual workers to understand the challenges and opportunities linked to new ways of working.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“contributions on the gig economy have snowballed since the early contributions published in NTWE (Lehdonvirta 2018;Wood et al. 2018;Pichault and McKeown 2019).”
From Reflecting on 40 Years of New Technology, Work and Employment: Insights From the Current Editors on the Past and Prospects for the Future (2026) · cites this paper as Pichault and McKeown 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 · Cited by 3,199
Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400101 · Cited by 2,998
Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism
Adler, P. S. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.215.10117 · Cited by 1,512
A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work
Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316632058 · Cited by 1,465
The human capital hoax: Work, debt and insecurity in the era of Uberization
Fleming, P. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616686129 · Cited by 473
Research works printed but not linked: 74
- Beazley R., 1984, The Employee‐Independent Contractor Dichotomy, Law Institute Journal, 58, 665
- 10.1177/0950017012474709 · DOI
- Bieback A.‐J., 1992, The Protection of Atypical Work in Australia and West German Labour Law, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 5, 17
- 10.1017/jmo.2016.29 · DOI
- 10.1108/ER-11-2012-0081 · DOI
- Bridges W., 1995, Jobshift
- 10.1016/j.emj.2015.11.003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0018726715610809 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/S0733-558X20160000047024 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2011.0302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ntwe.12058 · DOI
- 10.1093/indlaw/dwm014 · DOI
- Creighton B., 2016, Labour Law: An Introduction
- Deakin S., 2013, Addressing Labour Market Segmentation: The Role of Labour Law
- 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2007.00011.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0196859911416362 · DOI
- 10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.01 · DOI · Paper page
- Dixon J.E., 1999, Social Security in Global Perspective
- 10.1111/ntwe.12093 · DOI
- European Commission, 2006, Modernising Labour Law to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century
- 10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_2 · DOI
- 10.1111/ntwe.12088 · DOI
- Fineman M.A., 2000, Cracking the Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, and Self‐Sufficiency, Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 8, 13
- 10.1177/095001701400438152 · DOI
- Freidson E., 2001, Professionalism: The Third Logic
- Gandini A., 2015, The Rise of Coworking Spaces: A Literature Review, Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 15, 193
- 10.1177/0170840616685354 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0950017011398891 · DOI
- Hakim C., 2000, Work‐Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory, 10.1093/oso/9780199242092.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/0199247757.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0959680109339406 · DOI
- 10.1177/0950017012460315 · DOI
- 10.1111/ntwe.12025 · DOI · Paper page
- ILO, 2016, Non‐Standard Employment Around the World. Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects
- Johansen R., 1995, Upsizing the Individual in the Downsized Corporation Managing in the Wake of Reengineering, Globalization, and Overwhelming Technological Change
- Johns T., 2013, The Third Wave of Virtual Work, Harvard Business Review, 66
- Katz L.F.andA.B.Krueger(2016) The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States 1995–2015 Working Paper.https://krueger.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/akrueger/files/katz_krueger_cws_-_march_29_20165.pdf(accessed 10 February 2019). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/13552551011027002 · DOI
- 10.1080/09585192.2011.610937 · DOI
- 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31829176eb · DOI
- 10.1080/13215906.2015.1085627 · DOI
- 10.1093/indlaw/dwq029 · DOI
- 10.2307/259035 · DOI
- 10.1177/0018726713520022 · DOI
- 10.1177/0959680117740425 · DOI
- Malone T.W., 2011, The Big Idea: The Age of Hyperspecialization, Harvard Business Review, 89, 56
- 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00335.x · DOI
- 10.2307/3069357 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1472-9296.2005.00174.x · DOI
- 10.1108/PR-09-2016-0256 · DOI
- McNamara M., 2006, The Hidden Health and Safety Costs of Casual Employment
- Miller M.R., 2015, Getting Paid in the Naked Economy, Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal, 32, 279
- Mintzberg H., 1979, The Structuring of Organisations. A Synthesis of the Research
- Mintzberg H., 1983, Power In and Around Organisations
- 10.1177/0018726716648387 · DOI
- 10.7591/9780801460388 · DOI
- 10.1111/irel.12055 · DOI
- 10.1177/1350508415572509 · DOI
- 10.1111/1464-0597.00127 · DOI
- Prieto M., 2017, A Reflection on the Future of Work and Society
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.008 · DOI
- Rifkin J., 1995, The End of Work. The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post‐Market Era
- 10.1007/s11187-009-9241-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/bjir.12041 · DOI
- 10.1080/02678373.2012.660367 · DOI
- 10.1111/ntwe.12080 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0958928708101867 · DOI
- 10.5040/9781849664554 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1359432X.2016.1208653 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09585190601102349 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMR.2010.45577926 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0950017008096745 · DOI
- 10.2307/259118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/jmo.2016.40 · DOI
Cited by
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12258 · Cited by 1,050
Barriers to entry of gig workers in the gig platforms: exploring the dark side of the gig economy
Behl, A., Rajagopal, K., Sheorey, P., & Mahendra, A. (2022) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-08-2021-0235 · Cited by 62
Hodder, A., Valizade, D., Hardy, K., MacKenzie, R., & Smith, A. (2026) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.70054
Metadata
- Authors
- Pichault, F., & McKeown, T.
- ORCID
- Pichault, François
- Venue
- New Technology, Work and Employment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-72
- ISSN
- 0268-1072
- 1468-005X
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Securex professorship « Towards new opportunities for organisations, people & employment intermediaries in a changing labour market »
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autonomy at work in the gig economy: analysing work status, work content and working conditions of independent professionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ntwe.12132
- The paper
- Pichault, F., & McKeown, T. (2019). Autonomy at work in the gig economy: analysing work status, work content and working conditions of independent professionals. New Technology, Work and Employment. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.