Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction to the Special Issue ‐ The internet, social media and trade union revitalization: Still behind the digital curve or catching up?

Geelan, Torsten·2021·New Technology, Work and Employment

Abstract

This article introduces the special issue of New Technology, Work and Employment titled “The Internet, Social Media and Trade Union Revitalization: Still Behind the Digital Curve or Catching Up?” The objectives of this special issue are threefold. First, to develop an analytical framework that can help researchers assess the role that internal and external factors play in mediating the nature and scope of union experimentation with new information and communication technologies (ICTs) and its contribution to the outcomes of revitalisation. Second, to present methods and concepts that are new to this area of research. Third, to generate empirical insight into how the various actors that constitute the trade union movement (e.g. worker councils, union confederations, trade unions, and union‐led coalitions) can and are using the internet, social media and artificial intelligence as a means of revitalisation. Taken together the geographical scope of the articles range from single‐country cases studies in Germany, the UK and Canada, to a cross‐national case study in Australia and the USA, and a comparative study across Europe. In terms of ICTs, attention is given to websites, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and an AI chatbot.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ntwe.12205

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270149.003.0002 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/00236561003654776 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1080/1369118X.2011.579141 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1080/00236561003654719 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/0022185620979337 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/1468-2338.00276 · DOI
  7. Castells M., 2009, Communication power
  8. 10.1108/17422040510595618 · DOI
  9. 10.3726/978-1-4539-1586-8 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/1467-8543.00247 · DOI
  11. 10.7202/051328ar · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0160449X0002400401 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/1467-8543.00250 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00279.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Flanagan F., 2021, How can unions use artificial intelligence to build power? The use of AI chatbots for labour organising in the US and Australia, New Technology, Work and Employment, 10.1111/ntwe.12178 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270149.003.0008 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/bjir.12482 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270149.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1108/17422040510595609 · DOI
  20. 10.4324/9781315714431-9 · DOI
  21. Fuchs C., 2020, Communication and capitalism: a critical theory
  22. Geelan T., The combustible mix of coalitional and communicative power: trade unions and the case of the people’s assembly against austerity, New Technology, Work and Employment
  23. 10.1057/9781137429537_5 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/bjir.12178 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/irj.12190 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/1468-2338.00275 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/1468-2338.00278 · DOI
  28. 10.1108/cpoib.2005.29001baa.002 · DOI
  29. Gumbrell‐McCormick R., 2018, Trade unions in Western Europe: hard times, hard choices
  30. Hamann K., 2004, Unions as Political Actors: A Recipe for Revitalization?
  31. 10.1111/bjir.12084 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/ntwe.12187 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/ntwe.12173 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/ntwe.12025 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1111/ntwe.12055 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/ntwe.12154 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0143831X18777608 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/ntwe.12209 · DOI
  39. Hunt T., 2021, Covid‐19 and the work of unions: new challenges and new responses
  40. 10.1177/102425890701300204 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/0022185616677558 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/978-3-030-24914-4 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/bjir.12010 · DOI
  44. 10.1177/1035304615614445 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1510536 · DOI
  46. Lee E., 1996, The labour movement and the internet: the new internationalism
  47. 10.1177/1024258910373867 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/irel.12251 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/1468-2338.00279 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/1024258916677880 · DOI
  51. 10.1108/17422040510595645 · DOI
  52. McChesney R., 2013, Digital disconnect: how capitalism is turning the internet against democracy
  53. 10.7591/9780801470752 · DOI
  54. 10.1080/00236561003654735 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/978-3-319-58232-0 · DOI
  56. 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00287.x · DOI
  57. 10.1111/bjir.12060 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/bjir.12507 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/ntwe.12184 · DOI
  60. Pasquier V., 2018, The power of social media as a labour campaigning tool: lessons from OUR Walmart and the Fight for 15
  61. 10.1111/1468-005X.00018 · DOI
  62. 10.1177/0959680113516405 · DOI
  63. 10.1177/1024258916655761 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2007.00192.x · DOI
  65. Shostak A.B., 1999, Cyberunion: empowering labour through computer technology
  66. Staples R., 2021, The dilemma of social media for German work councils representing qualified employees – the case of a German car manufacturer, New Technology, Work and Employment, 10.1111/ntwe.12175 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/ser/mwu036 · DOI
  68. 10.2307/j.ctvjk2xq8 · DOI
  69. 10.1177/0018726719846262 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/gwao.12228 · DOI
  71. 10.1080/00236561003654669 · DOI
  72. Uba K., 2021, Political campaigns on YouTube: trade unions’ mobilisation in Europe, New Technology, Work and Employment
  73. Upchurch M., 2015, Striking with social media: the contested (online) terrain of workplace conflict, Organisation, 23, 639
  74. 10.1177/0267323103018002001 · DOI
  75. 10.1111/irj.12103 · DOI
  76. 10.1177/0309816820906354 · DOI
  77. Zuboff S., 2019, The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Geelan, T.
Affiliations
Department of Sociology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Venue
New Technology, Work and Employment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-07
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
123-139
ISSN
  • 0268-1072
  • 1468-005X
Cited by
46
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.