The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concept Analysis of Spirituality: An Evolutionary Approach: Spirituality Concept Analysis
Open accessAbstract
AIM: The aim of this article is to clarify the concept of spirituality for future nursing research. BACKGROUND: Previous concept analyses of spirituality have mostly reviewed the conceptual literature with little consideration of the empirical literature. The literature reviewed in prior concept analyses extends from 1972 to 2005, with no analysis conducted in the past 9 years. DESIGN: Rodgers' evolutionary framework was used to review both the theoretical and empirical literature pertaining to spirituality. Evolutionary concept analysis is a formal method of philosophical inquiry, in which papers are analyzed to identify attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the concept. DATA SOURCE: Empirical and conceptual literature. RESULTS: Three defining attributes of spirituality were identified: connectedness, transcendence, and meaning in life. A conceptual definition of spirituality was proposed based on the findings. Also, four antecedents and five primary consequences of spirituality were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Spirituality is a complex concept. This concept analysis adds some clarification by proposing a definition of spirituality that is underpinned by both conceptual and empirical research. Furthermore, exemplars of spirituality, based on prior qualitative research, are presented to support the findings. Hence, the findings of this analysis could guide future nursing research on spirituality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,077
FRANKL, V. E. (1946) · Cited by 3,910
Strategies for theory construction nursing
Hough, C. (1989) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/0260-6917(89)90137-8 · Cited by 2,308
Spirituality, religion, and health: An emerging research field.
Miller, W. R., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.24 · Cited by 1,437
Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications
Rodgers, B. L., & Knafl, K. A. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,121
Spiritual But Not Religious? Beyond Binary Choices in the Study of Religion
Ammerman, N. T. (2013) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/jssr.12024 · Cited by 695
Theory and Nursing: A Systematic Approach
Pearson, B. D., Chinn, P. L., & Jacobs, M. K. (1983) · The American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3463398 · Cited by 664
Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle
Rodgers, B. L. (1989) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb03420.x · Cited by 643
Towards clarification of the meaning of spirituality
Tanyi, R. A. (2002) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02315.x · Cited by 631
Cited by
Doctors discussing religion and spirituality: A systematic literature review
Best, M., Butow, P., & Olver, I. (2016) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216315600912 · Cited by 216
Usman, M., Rofcanin, Y., Ali, M., Ogbonnaya, C., & Babalola, M. T. (2023) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22148 · Cited by 151
A concept analysis of the existential experience of adults with advanced cancer
Tarbi, E. C., & Meghani, S. H. (2019) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2019.03.006 · Cited by 61
Benites, A. C., Rodin, G., de Oliveira-Cardoso, É. A., & dos Santos, M. A. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06712-w · Cited by 37
Chan, C. H. Y., Lau, B. H. P., Wong, Q. S., Tam, M. Y. J., So, G. Y. K., Leung, H. T., Fung, Y. L., Chan, C., Li, R., & Ng, E. H. Y. (2019) · Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development · doi:10.1080/02185385.2019.1578684 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Weathers, E., McCarthy, G., & Coffey, A.
- Venue
- Nursing Forum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-02
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-96
- ISSN
- 0029-6473 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1494289090
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 26.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concept Analysis of Spirituality: An Evolutionary Approach: Spirituality Concept Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nuf.12128
- The paper
- Weathers, E., McCarthy, G., & Coffey, A. (2016). Concept Analysis of Spirituality: An Evolutionary Approach: Spirituality Concept Analysis. Nursing Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.