Cited by 66Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Mapping modalities of self‐awareness in mindfulness practice: a potential mechanism for clarifying habits of mind

Vago, David R.·2014·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

To better understand the neurobiological mechanisms by which mindfulness‐based practices function in a psychotherapeutic context, this article details the definition, techniques, and purposes ascribed to mindfulness training as described by its Buddhist tradition of origin and by contemporary neurocognitive models. Included is theory of how maladaptive mental processes become habitual and automatic, both from the Buddhist and Western psychological perspective. Specific noting and labeling techniques in open monitoring meditation, described in the Theravada and Western contemporary traditions, are highlighted as providing unique access to multiple modalities of awareness. Potential explicit and implicit mechanisms are discussed by which such techniques can contribute to transforming maladaptive habits of mind and perceptual and cognitive biases, improving efficiency, facilitating integration, and providing the flexibility to switch between systems of self‐processing. Finally, a model is provided to describe the timing by which noting and labeling practices have the potential to influence different stages of low‐ and high‐level neural processing. Hypotheses are proposed concerning both levels of processing in relation to the extent of practice. Implications for the nature of subjective experience and self‐processing as it relates to one's habits of mind, behavior, and relation to the external world, are also described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.12270

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vago (2014) stated that mindfulness-based practices may operate by replacing learned maladaptive representations by novel more accurate observations and decreased bias.

    “As a final illustration of this idea of unbiased processing, Vago (2014) stated that mindfulness-based practices may operate by replacing the learned maladaptive representations by novel more accurate observations and decreased bias.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 66

Authors
Vago, D. R.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Vago, David R.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10
Volume
1307
Issue
1
Pages
28-42
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1591130879
Cited by
66
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness, self-awareness, habits of mind, open monitoring meditation, Buddhist meditation, Theravada Buddhism, cognitive biases, self-processing, subjective experience
MeSH terms
Attention, Awareness, Buddhism, Cognition, Humans, Learning, Models, Neurological, Stress, Psychological, Meditation, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review