The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct Estimation of Equivalence Scales and More Evidence on Independence of Base
Abstract
We explore a direct approach to estimating household equivalence scales from income satisfaction data. Our method differs from previous approaches to using satisfaction data for this purpose in that it can be used to directly fit and evaluate closed‐form and non‐parametric equivalence scales of any desired form. Its flexibility makes it easy to consider specific aspects such as income dependence or more specific information on household composition (such as whether household members live in a partner relationship). We estimate and evaluate a number of scales used in the literature. If the equivalence scale is assumed to be independent of income and to depend only on household size, we do not reject the validity of the widely used square‐root scale at conventional significance levels. We also test GESE and GAESE restrictions (Donaldson and Pendakur, 2003, 2006) and investigate in detail to what extent household economies of scale depend on income. Our results suggest that the income dependence differs fundamentally across household types (rising economies of scale for ‘family’ households, falling economies of scale for multi‐adult households without children and no income dependence for other households).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, the rejection of income independence is consistent with earlier findings (Koulovatianos et al. 2005; Biewen and Juhasz 2017).”
From Assessing differences in household needs: a comparison of approaches for the estimation of equivalence scales using German expenditure data (2021) · cites this paper as Biewen and Juhasz 2017
Citations
Cites
Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.67 · Cited by 1,391
Buhmann, B., Rainwater, L., Schmaus, G., & Smeeding, T. M. (1988) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4991.1988.tb00564.x · Cited by 1,200
The marginal utility of income
Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2008) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.01.007 · Cited by 609
The information content of equivalence scales
Blundell, R., & Lewbel, A. (1991) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(91)90089-v · Cited by 277
Equivalent-expenditure functions and expenditure-dependent equivalence scales
Donaldson, D., & Pendakur, K. (2004) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(02)00134-2 · Cited by 95
On the income dependence of equivalence scales
Koulovatianos, C., Schröder, C., & Schmidt, U. (2005) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.09.005 · Cited by 90
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1111/rssa.12090 · DOI
- 10.2307/2234982 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10258-002-0006-z · DOI · Paper page
- Biewen M.andJuhasz A.(2013).A Goodness‐of‐Fit Approach to estimating equivalence scales IZA Discussion Paper No. 7209 Institute for the Study of Labor Bonn. · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00182510 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00369.x · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(1998090)13:5<435::AID-JAE506>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
- 10.1093/restud/rdt019 · DOI
- 10.1111/1475-4991.00042 · DOI
- 10.2307/2234983 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8586.1992.tb00538.x · DOI
- Cutler D. M., 1992, Rising inequality? Changes in the distribution of income and consumption in the 1980s’,, American Economic Review, 82, 546
- 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.09.006 · DOI
- 10.2307/2234774 · DOI
- 10.1198/073500106000000035 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.103.1.438 · DOI
- Easterlin R. A.andSawangfa W.(2007).Happiness and Domain Satisfaction Theory and Evidence IZA Discussion Paper No. 2584 Institute for the Study of Labor Bonn. · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x · DOI
- Frey B. S., 2002, Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Wellbeing, 10.1515/9781400829262 · DOI
- 10.1257/0002828041464551 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90058-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-2921(78)90009-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-2727(89)90035-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Lewbel A., 2008, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 26
- 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.09.012 · DOI
- Melenberg C., 1996, Frontiers in Economic Psychology ‐ 20th IAREP conference, 500
- 10.2307/1912023 · DOI
- Oswald A., 2003, How much do external factors affect wellbeing? A way to use ’happiness economics’ to decide’,, The Psychologist, 16, 140
- 10.1016/0047-2727(94)01465-Z · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00020-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1468-0335.00250 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00151-9 · DOI
- Sacks D. W. Stevenson B.andWolfers J.(2010).Subjective Well‐Being Economic Development and Growth NBER Working Paper No. 16441 National Bureau of Economic Research. · DOI
- 10.1108/S0573-8555(2009)0000288016 · DOI
- 10.1111/1475-4991.00092 · DOI · Paper page
- van Praag B., 1968, Individual welfare functions and consumer behavior
- 10.1016/0014-2921(71)90045-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90090-Z · DOI
- 10.2307/145775 · DOI
- Wooldridge J. M., 2010, Econometric Analysis of Cross‐Section and Panel Data
Cited by
Dudel, C., Garbuszus, J. M., & Schmied, J. (2021) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-020-01822-6 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Biewen, M., & Juhasz, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- University of Tübingen
- Corresponding author
- Biewen, Martin
- ORCID
- Biewen, Martin
- Venue
- Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-06-18
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 875-905
- ISSN
- 0305-9049 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0084
- OpenAlex
- W3169924541
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
- Keywords
- household equivalence scales, income satisfaction, income dependence, economies of scale, household composition, household size, family households
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review