Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity: a systematic review and critical evaluation of the definitions used

Rey‐López, J. P., de Rezende, L. F., Pastor‐Valero, M., Tess, B. H.·2014·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: We performed a systematic review of the prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity (MHO). Medline, W eb of S cience and EMBASE were searched for original articles from inception to N ovember 2013. Only prospective and cross‐sectional studies were included. After screening 478 titles, we selected 55 publications, of which 27 were population‐based studies and were used in the narrative synthesis. From the 27 studies, we identified 30 definitions of metabolic health, mainly based on four criteria: blood pressure, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and plasma glucose. Body mass index ≥30 kg m−2 was the main indicator used to define obesity (74% of the studies). Overall, MHO prevalence ranged between 6% and 75%. In the studies that stratified the analysis by sex, prevalence was higher in women (seven out of nine studies) and in younger ages (all four studies). One‐third of the studies (n = 9) reported the response rate. Of these, four reported a response rate of ≥70% and they showed MHO prevalence estimates between 10% and 51%. The heterogeneity of MHO prevalence estimates described in this paper strengthens calls for the urgent need for a commonly established metabolic health definition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.12198

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Rey‐López, J. P., de Rezende, L. F., Pastor‐Valero, M., & Tess, B. H.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-16
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
781-790
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W1572399582
Cited by
310
References
5
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity: a systematic review and critical evaluation of the definitions used. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/obr.12198
The paper
Rey‐López, J. P., de Rezende, L. F., Pastor‐Valero, M., & Tess, B. H. (2014). The prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity: a systematic review and critical evaluation of the definitions used. Obesity Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12198

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.