The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity: a systematic review and critical evaluation of the definitions used
Abstract
Summary: We performed a systematic review of the prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity (MHO). Medline, W eb of S cience and EMBASE were searched for original articles from inception to N ovember 2013. Only prospective and cross‐sectional studies were included. After screening 478 titles, we selected 55 publications, of which 27 were population‐based studies and were used in the narrative synthesis. From the 27 studies, we identified 30 definitions of metabolic health, mainly based on four criteria: blood pressure, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and plasma glucose. Body mass index ≥30 kg m−2 was the main indicator used to define obesity (74% of the studies). Overall, MHO prevalence ranged between 6% and 75%. In the studies that stratified the analysis by sex, prevalence was higher in women (seven out of nine studies) and in younger ages (all four studies). One‐third of the studies (n = 9) reported the response rate. Of these, four reported a response rate of ≥70% and they showed MHO prevalence estimates between 10% and 51%. The heterogeneity of MHO prevalence estimates described in this paper strengthens calls for the urgent need for a commonly established metabolic health definition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospective Studies Collaboration (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60318-4 · Cited by 4,807
Finucane, M. M., Stevens, G. A., Cowan, M. J., Danaei, G., Lin, J. K., Paciorek, C. J., Singh, G. M., Gutierrez, H. R., Lu, Y., Bahalim, A. N., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62037-5 · Cited by 4,050
Participation Rates in Epidemiologic Studies
Galea, S., & Tracy, M. (2007) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013 · Cited by 1,877
Metabolically healthy obesity: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical implications
Stefan, N., Häring, H.-U., Hu, F. B., & Schulze, M. B. (2013) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70062-7 · Cited by 857
Hamer, M., Batty, G. D., & Kivimaki, M. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2012.30 · Cited by 132
Cited by
Adipose tissue dysfunction as determinant of obesity-associated metabolic complications
Longo, M., Zatterale, F., Naderi, J., Parrillo, L., Formisano, P., Raciti, G. A., Beguinot, F., & Miele, C. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20092358 · Cited by 1,575
Chait, A., & den Hartigh, L. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2020.00022 · Cited by 1,529
Blüher, M. (2020) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnaa004 · Cited by 1,090
Kalinkovich, A., & Livshits, G. (2017) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2016.09.008 · Cited by 882
The science of obesity management: an endocrine society scientific statement
Bray, G. A., Heisel, W. E., Afshin, A., Jensen, M. D., Dietz, W. H., Long, M., Kushner, R. F., Daniels, S. R., Wadden, T. A., Tsai, A. G., et al. (2018) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2017-00253 · Cited by 812
Metadata
- Authors
- Rey‐López, J. P., de Rezende, L. F., Pastor‐Valero, M., & Tess, B. H.
- Venue
- Obesity Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07-16
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 781-790
- ISSN
- 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-789X
- OpenAlex
- W1572399582
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity: a systematic review and critical evaluation of the definitions used. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/obr.12198
- The paper
- Rey‐López, J. P., de Rezende, L. F., Pastor‐Valero, M., & Tess, B. H. (2014). The prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity: a systematic review and critical evaluation of the definitions used. Obesity Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.