Hunter-gatherers as models in public health
Abstract
Summary Hunter‐gatherer populations are remarkable for their excellent metabolic and cardiovascular health and thus are often used as models in public health, in an effort to understand the root, evolutionary causes of non‐communicable diseases. Here, we review recent work on health, activity, energetics and diet among hunter‐gatherers and other small‐scale societies (e.g. subsistence farmers, horticulturalists and pastoralists), as well as recent fossil and archaeological discoveries, to provide a more comprehensive perspective on lifestyle and health in these populations. We supplement these analyses with new data from the Hadza, a hunter‐gatherer population in northern Tanzania. Longevity among small‐scale populations approaches that of industrialized populations, and metabolic and cardiovascular disease are rare. Obesity prevalence is very low (<5%), and mean body fat percentage is modest (women: 24–28%, men: 9–18%). Activity levels are high, exceeding 100 min d −1 of moderate and vigorous physical activity, but daily energy expenditures are similar to industrialized populations. Diets in hunter‐gatherer and other small‐scale societies tend to be less energy dense and richer in fibre and micronutrients than modern diets but are not invariably low carbohydrate as sometimes argued. A more integrative understanding of hunter‐gatherer health and lifestyle, including elements beyond diet and activity, will improve public health efforts in industrialized populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies of remaining contemporary hunter-gatherer societies have found their dietary fiber intake to be around 80-150 g per day.
“Studies that have investigated the dietary patterns of remaining contemporary hunter–gatherer societies, have found their dietary fiber intake to be around 80–150 g per day [211].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment (2022) · cites this paper as [211]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 229
- Authors
- Pontzer, H., Wood, B. M., & Raichlen, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pontzer, H.
- Venue
- Obesity Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 24-35
- ISSN
- 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-789X
- OpenAlex
- W2903125205
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The University of Arizona Bio5 Institute
- The L.S.B. Leakey Foundation
- U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF-BCS 1440671, NSF-BCS 1440841, NSF-BCS 1440867, NSF-BCS-0850815)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Health and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- hunter-gatherers, small-scale societies, non-communicable diseases, metabolic health, cardiovascular health, physical activity, energy expenditure, diet, Hadza, obesity, body fat percentage, longevity, subsistence farmers, pastoralists, horticulturists, evolutionary medicine, energy density, fibre intake, micronutrients
- MeSH terms
- Energy Metabolism, Humans, Life Style, Longevity, Public Health, Exercise, Diet, Paleolithic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review