The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Myopia and international educational performance
Abstract
Purpose: To analyse the relationship between myopia, educational performance and engagement in after‐school tutorial classes. Methods: Educational performance data and data on engagement in after‐school tutorial classes were taken from the results of the O rganisation for E conomic C ooperation and D evelopment ( OECD ) P rogram in S econdary A ssessment ( PISA ) reports for 2009, which tested educational outcomes in representative samples of 15 year‐old school children from 65 jurisdictions. High prevalence of myopia (>70%) and low prevalence of myopia (<40%) locations were identified by systematic literature search. Results: Six locations with a high prevalence of myopia were identified from among the participants in PISA 2009 – S hanghai‐ C hina, H ong K ong‐ C hina, T aiwan, S ingapore, J apan and S outh K orea. All were ranked in the top quartile on educational performance. Other participants in the top educational performance quartile were identified as locations with a low prevalence of myopia, including A ustralia and F inland. The locations with a high prevalence of myopia combined high educational performance and high engagement in after‐school tutorials, whereas the locations with a low prevalence of myopia combined high educational performance with little engagement in tutorials. Discussion: These results show that it is possible to achieve high educational outcomes without extensive engagement in after‐school tutorials, and that the combination of high educational outcomes with extensive use of tutorials is associated with high prevalence rates of myopia. We suggest that extensive use of after‐school tutorials may be a marker of educational environments which impose high educational loads. Further quantification of educational loads to include after‐ school educational activities, such as homework, tutorials and other after‐school classes, as well as formal school classes, is desirable. Policy initiatives to decrease these loads may contribute to the prevention of myopia, perhaps, at least in part, by enabling children to spend more time outdoors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Time outdoors and the prevention of myopia
French, A. N., Ashby, R. S., Morgan, I. G., & Rose, K. A. (2013) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2013.04.018 · Cited by 395
Self-citationEducation and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by mendelian randomisation
Mountjoy, E., Davies, N. M., Plotnikov, D., Smith, G. D., Rodriguez, S., Williams, C. E., Guggenheim, J. A., & Atan, D. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k2022 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, I. G., & Rose, K. A.
- Venue
- Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-338
- ISSN
- 0275-5408 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-1313
- OpenAlex
- W1964838260
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myopia and international educational performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/opo.12040
- The paper
- Morgan, I. G., & Rose, K. A. (2013). Myopia and international educational performance. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.