Efficacy of Lower Limb Compression in the Management of Vasovagal Syncope—Randomized, Crossover Study
Abstract
Introduction: Vasovagal syncope (VS) is the most prevalent cause of transient loss of consciousness. The treatment consists of lifestyle modifications and pacemaker in some patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of measures to compress the lower limbs in patients with recurrent episodes of VS submitted to the tilt‐test (TT). Methods and Results: Twenty patients, average age 30.5 years (15–75), 13 (65%) female, with a clinical diagnosis of VS and previous TT with a positive result and who had at least one episode of syncope during the last year, were included in this placebo‐controlled randomized crossover study. The patients underwent two consecutive TT, at a 1‐hour interval, with and without compression by pneumatic compression boots with 40 mmHg at the heels and 30 mmHg for the legs. The blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) of these patients were monitored continuously. The outcome assessors were blinded. The results of the TT were positive in 13 (65%) of the patients in the control groups and in two (10%) of the patients with compression (P < 0.0001). Throughout the test, the systolic BP was not different among the groups. On the other hand, the HR measures showed a difference only in the tilted position at 2 minutes, of 73 ± 16 beats per minute (bpm) in the control group and of 69 ± 16 bpm (P = 0.047) in the compression group. Conclusion: Compression of the lower limbs is very effective to render the TT negative in patients with a diagnosis of VS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Graded compression garments and abdominal binders have improved symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in conditions associated with excessive blood pooling.
“Graded compression garments and abdominal binders have improved symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in conditions associated with excessive blood pooling (52, 53).”
From Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: mechanisms and new therapies (2020) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- SANTOS, R. Q. D., SMIDT, L., SUZIGAN, B. H., DE SOUZA, L. V., & BARBISAN, J. N.
- Affiliations
- Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (BR)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR)
- Medical Student at Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre‐RS Brazil
- Corresponding author
- SUZIGAN, BRUNA HELENA
- Venue
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-455
- ISSN
- 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8159
- OpenAlex
- W2134545427
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- vasovagal syncope, lower limb compression, tilt table test, recurrent syncope, heart rate, blood pressure, transient loss of consciousness, cardiac pacemaker
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Pressure, Recurrence, Shoes, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Tilt-Table Test, Syncope, Vasovagal, Lower Extremity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review