Cited by 8Evolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPhilosophy and History of Science

Macroevolution in silico: scales, constraints and universals

Solé, Ricard V., Valverde, Sergi·2013·Palaeontology

Abstract

Large‐scale evolution involves several layers of complexity spanning multiple scales, from genes and organisms to whole ecosystems. In this article, we review several models involving the macroevolution of artificial organisms, communities or ecosystems, highlighting their importance and potential role in expanding the Modern Synthesis. Afterwards, we summarize the key results obtained from our model of artificially evolved ecosystems where individuals are defined as embodied entities within a physical, simulated world where they can evolve different traits and exploit multiple resources. Starting from an initial state where single cells with identical genotypes are present, the system evolves towards complex communities where the feedbacks between population expansion, evolved cell adhesion and the structure of the environment lead to a major innovation resulting from the emergence of ecosystem engineering. The tempo and mode of this process illustrates the relevance in considering a physical embedding as part of the model description and the feedbacks between different scales within the evolutionary hierarchy. The future steps in modelling macroevolution by means of in silico models and how they might contribute to the Modern Synthesis are outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pala.12047

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other simulations of evolving ecosystems confirm the generative potential of artificial life systems.

    “Other simulations of evolving ecosystems confirm the generative potential of artificial life systems [300,314–317].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [317]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solé, R. V., & Valverde, S.
Affiliations
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Solé, Ricard V.
Venue
Palaeontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-08
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
1327-1340
ISSN
  • 0031-0239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4983
OpenAlex
W1983437213
Cited by
8
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palaeontology (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
macroevolution, artificial organisms, artificial ecosystems, embodied evolution, ecosystem engineering, cell adhesion, evolutionary innovation, Modern Synthesis, evolutionary hierarchy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review