Cited by 16Plant Parasitism and ResistanceGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsPlant Molecular Biology Research

Functional screening of willow alleles in A rabidopsis combined with QTL mapping in willow (S alix) identifies S x MAX 4 as a coppicing response gene

Open access
Salmon, Jemma, Ward, Sally P., Hanley, Steven J., Leyser, Ottoline, Karp, Angela·2014·Plant Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Willows (Salix spp.) are important biomass crops due to their ability to grow rapidly with low fertilizer inputs and ease of cultivation in short-rotation coppice cycles. They are relatively undomesticated and highly diverse, but functional testing to identify useful allelic variation is time-consuming in trees and transformation is not yet possible in willow. Arabidopsis is heralded as a model plant from which knowledge can be transferred to advance the improvement of less tractable species. Here, knowledge and methodologies from Arabidopsis were successfully used to identify a gene influencing stem number in coppiced willows, a complex trait of key biological and industrial relevance. The strigolactone-related More AXillary growth (MAX) genes were considered candidates due to their role in shoot branching. We previously demonstrated that willow and Arabidopsis show similar response to strigolactone and that transformation rescue of Arabidopsis max mutants with willow genes could be used to detect allelic differences. Here, this approach was used to screen 45 SxMAX1, SxMAX2, SxMAX3 and SxMAX4 alleles cloned from 15 parents of 11 mapping populations varying in shoot-branching traits. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequencies were locus dependent, ranging from 29.2 to 74.3 polymorphic sites per kb. SxMAX alleles were 98%-99% conserved at the amino acid level, but different protein products varying in their ability to rescue Arabidopsis max mutants were identified. One poor rescuing allele, SxMAX4D, segregated in a willow mapping population where its presence was associated with increased shoot resprouting after coppicing and colocated with a QTL for this trait.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbi.12154

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The willow ortholog of MAX4 co-localizes with a QTL for shoot resprouting after coppicing.

    “The willow ortholog of MAX4 co-localizes with a QTL for shoot resprouting after coppicing (Salmon et al., 2014).”

    From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Salmon et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Alder A Holdermann I Beyer P Al-Babili S Carotenoid oxygenases involved in plant branching catalyse a highly specific conserved apocarotenoid cleavage reaction Biochem. J 2008 416 289 296 18637791
  2. Arite T Iwata H Ohshima K Maekawa M Nakajima M Kojima M Sakakibara H Kyozuka J DWARF10, an RMS1MAX4DAD1 ortholog, controls lateral bud outgrowth in rice Plant J 2007 51 1019 1029 17655651
  3. Arite T Umehara M Ishikawa S Hanada A Maekawa M Yamaguchi S Kyozuka J d14, a strigolactone-insensitive mutant of rice, shows an accelerated outgrowth of tillers Plant Cell Physiol 2009 50 1416 1424 19542179
  4. Auldridge ME Block A Vogel JT Dabney-Smith C Mila I Bouzayen M Magallanes-Lundback M DellaPenna D McCarty DR Klee HJ Characterization of three members of the Arabidopsis carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase family demonstrates the divergent roles of this multifunctional enzyme family Plant J 2006 45 982 993 16507088
  5. Barker GLA Edwards KJ A genome-wide analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism diversity in the world's major cereal crops Plant Biotechnol. J 2009 7 318 325 19386040
  6. Booker J Auldridge M Wills S McCarty D Klee H Leyser O MAX3/CCD7 is a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase required for the synthesis of a novel plant signaling molecule Curr. Biol 2004 14 1232 1238 15268852
  7. Booker J Sieberer T Wright W Williamson L Willett B Stirnberg P Turnbull C Srinivasan M Goddard P Leyser O MAX1 encodes a cytochrome P450 family member that acts downstream of MAX3/4 to produce a carotenoid-derived branch-inhibiting hormone Dev. Cell 2005 8 443 449 15737939
  8. Challis RJ Hepworth J Mouchel C Waites R Leyser O A role for MORE AXILLARY GROWTH1 (MAX1) in evolutionary diversity in strigolactone signaling upstream of MAX2 Plant Physiol 2013 161 1885 1902 23424248 PMC3613463
  9. Clough S Bent A Floral dip, a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana Plant J 1998 16 735 743 10069079
  10. Delaux P-M Xie X Timme RE Puech-Pages V Dunand C Lecompte E Delwiche CF Yoneyama K Becard G Sejalon-Delmas N Origin of strigolactones in the green lineage New Phytol 2012 195 857 871 22738134
  11. Domagalska MA Leyser O Signal integration in the control of shoot branching Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2011 12 211 221 21427763
  12. Dong L Ishak A Yu J Zhoa R Zhao L Identification and functional analysis of three MAX2 orthologs in Chrysanthemum J. Integr. Plant Biol 2013 55 434 442 23302095
  13. Gao Z Qian Q Liu X Yan M Feng Q Dong G Liu J Han B Dwarf 88, a novel putative esterase gene affecting architecture of rice plant Plant Mol. Biol 2009 71 265 276 19603144
  14. Gleave AP A versatile binary vector system with a T-DNA organizational structure conducive to efficient integration of cloned DNA into the plant genome Plant Mol. Biol 1992 20 1203 1207 1463857
  15. Greb T Clarenz O Schafer E Muller D Herrero R Schmitz G Theres K Molecular analysis of the LATERAL SUPPRESSOR gene in Arabidopsis reveals a conserved control mechanism for axillary meristem formation Genes Dev 2003 17 1175 1187 12730136 PMC196050
  16. Hamiaux C Drummond RSM Janssen BJ Ledger SE Cooney JM Newcomb RD Snowden KC DAD2 is an alpha/beta hydrolase likely to be involved in the perception of the plant branching hormone, strigolactone Curr. Biol 2012 22 2032 2036 22959345
  17. Hanley SJ Karp A Genetic strategies for dissecting complex traits in biomass willows (Salix spp) Tree Physiol 2013 doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt089 24218244 · DOI
  18. Johnson X Brcich T Dun EA Goussot M Haurogne K Beveridge CA Rameau C Branching genes are conserved across species. Genes controlling a novel signal in pea are coregulated by other long-distance signals Plant Physiol 2006 142 1014 1026 16980559 PMC1630745
  19. Kagiyama M Hirano Y Mori T Kim S-Y Kyozuka J Seto Y Yamaguchi S Hakoshima T Structures of D14 and D14L in the strigolactone and karrikin signaling pathways Genes Cells 2013 18 147 160 23301669
  20. Kammerer B Kahlich R Biegert C Gleiter CH Heide L HPLC-MS/MS analysis of willow bark extracts contained in pharmaceutical preparations Phytochem. Anal 2005 16 470 478 16315493
  21. Karimi M Inze D Depicker A GATEWAY™ vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation Trends Plant Sci 2002 7 193 195 11992820
  22. Karp A Shield I Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge New Phytol 2008 179 15 32 18422906
  23. Karp A Hanley SJ Trybush SO Macalpine W Pei M Shield I Genetic improvement of willow for bioenergy and biofuels J. Integr. Plant Biol 2011 53 151 165 21205181
  24. Kearse M Moir R Wilson A Stones-Havas S Cheung M Sturrock S Buxton S Cooper A Markowitz S Duran C Thierer T Ashton B Meintjes P Drummond A Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data Bioinformatics 2012 28 1647 1649 22543367 PMC3371832
  25. Ledger SE Janssen BJ Karunairetnam S Wang T Snowden KC Modified CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE8 expression correlates with altered branching in kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) New Phytol 2010 188 803 813 20659299
  26. Leyser O The fall and rise of apical dominance – Commentary Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev 2005 15 468 471 15964756
  27. Leyser O The control of shoot branching: an example of plant information processing Plant, Cell Environ 2009 32 694 703 19143993
  28. Liang J Zhao L Challis R Leyser O Strigolactone regulation of shoot branching in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum) J. Exp. Bot 2010 61 3069 3078 20478970 PMC2892150
  29. Lin H Wang R Qian Q Yan M Meng X Fu Z Yan C Jiang B Su Z Li J Wang Y DWARF27, an iron-containing protein required for the biosynthesis of strigolactones, regulates rice tiller bud outgrowth Plant Cell 2009 21 1512 1525 19470589 PMC2700539
  30. Liu W Wu C Fu Y Hu G Si H Zhu L Luan W He Z Sun Z Identification and characterization of HTD2: a novel gene negatively regulating tiller bud outgrowth in rice Planta 2009 230 649 658 19579033
  31. Perdereau AC Douglas GC Hodkinson TR Kelleher CT High levels of variation in Salix lignocellulose genes revealed using poplar genomic resources Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013 6 114 129 23924375 PMC3750764
  32. Scaffidi A Waters M Ghisalberti EL Dixon KW Flematti GR Smith SM Carlactone-independent seedling morphogenesis in Arabidopsis Plant J 2013 76 1 9 23773129
  33. Schubert D Lechtenberg B Forsbach A Gils M Bahadur S Schmidt R Silencing in Arabidopsis T-DNA transformants: the predominant role of a gene-specific RNA sensing mechanism versus position effects Plant Cell 2004 16 2561 2572 15367719 PMC520955
  34. Schwartz SH Qin XQ Loewen MC The biochemical characterization of two carotenoid cleavage enzymes from Arabidopsis indicates that a carotenoid-derived compound inhibits lateral branching J. Biol. Chem 2004 279 46940 46945 15342640
  35. Sennerby-Forsse L Zsuffa L Bud formation and sprouting pattern of coppice shoots in some North American and European willows Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Biol. Sci 1992 98 246 247
  36. Snowden KC Simkin AJ Janssen BJ Templeton KR Loucas HM Simons JL Karunairetnam S Gleave AP Clark DG Klee HJ The Decreased apical dominance1/Petunia hybrida CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE8 gene affects branch production and plays a role in leaf senescence, root growth, and flower development Plant Cell 2005 17 746 759 15705953 PMC1069696
  37. Tsarouhas V Gullberg U Lagercrantz U An AFLP and RFLP linkage map and quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of growth traits in Salix Theor. Appl. Genet 2002 105 277 288 12582530
  38. Vogel JT Walter MH Giavalisco P Lytovchenko A Kohlen W Charnikhova T Simkin AJ Goulet C Strack D Bouwmeester HJ Fernie AR Klee HJ SlCCD7 controls strigolactone biosynthesis, shoot branching and mycorrhiza-induced apocarotenoid formation in tomato Plant J 2010 61 300 311 19845881
  39. Waters MT Nelson DC Scaffidi A Flematti GR Sun YK Dixon KW Smith SM Specialisation within the DWARF14 protein family confers distinct responses to karrikins and strigolactones in Arabidopsis Development 2012b 139 1285 1295 22357928
  40. Zou J Zhang S Zhang W Li G Chen Z Zhai W Zhao X Pan X Xie Q Zhu L The rice HIGH-TILLERING DWARF1 encoding an ortholog of Arabidopsis MAX3 is required for negative regulation of the outgrowth of axillary buds Plant J 2006 48 687 696 17092317

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salmon, J., Ward, S. P., Hanley, S. J., Leyser, O., & Karp, A.
Affiliations
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Karp, Angela
Venue
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-07
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
480-491
ISSN
  • 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7652
OpenAlex
W1982200807
Cited by
16
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government (NF0424)
  • Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  • University of Cambridge
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/C/00004956, E006833/1, BB/E007007/2, BB/J004278/1, BBS/E/C/00005199, BB/E006833/1, BB/E007007/1, NF0424)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
willow, coppicing, strigolactones, MAX gene, shoot branching, stem number, QTL mapping, functional screening, allelic variation, energy crops, short rotation coppice
MeSH terms
Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Chromosome Mapping, Genetic Testing, Molecular Sequence Data, Plant Proteins, Transformation, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Open Reading Frames, Sequence Alignment, Genes, Plant, Arabidopsis, Plant Shoots, Salix, Quantitative Trait Loci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review